When a relationship ends and complex financial matters need to be resolved, the traditional path through the Family Court system can feel overwhelming. With wait times for final hearings stretching to two years or more in many registries across Australia, separating couples are increasingly seeking alternatives that offer faster, more private, and less adversarial pathways to resolution. For those navigating intricate property settlements, superannuation splits, or spousal maintenance disputes, family law arbitration has emerged as a compelling option that combines the authority of a binding decision with the flexibility and efficiency that court processes often lack.

If you’re facing a complex financial dispute following separation, understanding how arbitration in family law works could save you significant time, money, and emotional distress while still ensuring your matter receives expert determination.

Understanding Family Law Arbitration in Australia

Family law arbitration is formally defined under section 10L of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) as a process, distinct from judicial proceedings, in which parties to a dispute present arguments and evidence to an independent arbitrator who then makes a binding determination to resolve the dispute. Unlike mediation, where a neutral third party facilitates negotiation between the parties, an arbitrator has the authority to make decisions that carry the same weight as court orders once registered.

The legislative framework governing family law arbitration is comprehensive. Parts VIII, VIIIA, VIIIAB, and VIIIB of the Family Law Act 1975 outline the types of financial matters that can be resolved through arbitration. These include property division between married and de facto couples, superannuation splitting, spousal maintenance, and disputes arising from binding financial agreements.

The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia actively supports arbitration as a legitimate and encouraged pathway to resolution. The Court’s Practice Direction on Arbitration establishes a National Arbitration List that case manages arbitrations requiring court orders to facilitate their effective conduct and manages applications regarding arbitration awards.

Who Conducts Family Law Arbitrations?

One of the key safeguards in Australia’s family law arbitration system is the strict qualification requirements for arbitrators. All family law arbitrators must be accredited by the Australian Institute of Family Law Arbitrators and Mediators (AIFLAM), the national body that maintains professional standards in this field.

To become an accredited arbitrator, practitioners must be legal professionals with at least five years of experience, with a minimum of 25% of their practice devoted to family law matters, or hold accreditation as a family law specialist from a State or Territory legal professional body. Arbitrators must also complete specialist training approved by AIFLAM and maintain ongoing professional development.

Many arbitrators are senior barristers, retired judges, or highly experienced family law specialists who bring decades of expertise to the role. This ensures that parties have their disputes determined by professionals with deep knowledge of family law principles and substantial experience in applying them to complex factual situations.

The Types of Matters Suitable for Arbitration

Arbitration is particularly well-suited to financial disputes arising from relationship breakdown. The different ways to resolve family law disputes include negotiation, mediation, collaborative law, and litigation, but arbitration occupies a unique space for matters that require determination rather than negotiated settlement.

Matters that can be resolved through arbitration include the division of property in family law disputes, including the family home, investment properties, business interests, shares, and other assets. Arbitration can also address the splitting of superannuation between parties, spousal maintenance claims, disputes arising from binding financial agreements, and debt allocation between separating couples.

It is important to note that children’s matters, including parenting arrangements and child custody disputes, cannot be arbitrated under Australian law. These matters remain within the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts, where the paramount consideration is always the best interests of the child. However, when parties have both parenting and property issues, resolving the financial matters through arbitration can significantly streamline the overall dispute resolution process.

The Arbitration Process Explained

The arbitration process begins when both parties agree to submit their dispute to arbitration. This agreement can occur privately, before any court proceedings commence, or the court itself can refer a matter to arbitration with the consent of all parties under section 13E of the Family Law Act 1975.

Once parties agree to arbitrate, they jointly select an arbitrator from the AIFLAM register of accredited practitioners. The parties and arbitrator then establish the procedural framework for the arbitration, including timelines for evidence exchange, the scope of disclosure requirements, and the format of the hearing itself. This flexibility is one of arbitration’s greatest advantages, as parties can tailor the process to suit the complexity and nature of their particular dispute.

The procedural requirements mirror those applicable to court proceedings in many respects. Under the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021, the disclosure procedures in Part 6.2 apply to arbitrations unless otherwise agreed between the parties. This ensures that both parties have access to the financial information necessary to present their case effectively.

A preliminary conference typically marks the formal commencement of the arbitration process, where the arbitrator and parties agree on procedural matters, identify the issues in dispute, and establish a timetable for the exchange of evidence and submissions. Depending on the complexity of the matter, a hearing may be conducted over one or more days, during which parties present arguments and evidence, and witnesses may be cross-examined.

Following the hearing, the arbitrator delivers a written decision known as an arbitration award. Under section 13H of the Family Law Act 1975, this award can be registered with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, at which point it has the same legal effect as a court order and becomes binding and enforceable.

Key Advantages of Arbitration Over Litigation

The benefits of choosing arbitration for complex family law disputes are substantial and multifaceted, addressing many of the frustrations that parties experience when navigating the court system.

Significantly Reduced Timeframes

Perhaps the most compelling advantage of arbitration is speed. The family court process can take anywhere from 18 months to three years or longer before a matter reaches final hearing. The Australian Institute of Family Studies has noted that Family Court Chief Justice Will Alstergren himself described delays in the system as “unacceptable.” In contrast, arbitration can typically be completed within weeks or a few months, depending on the complexity of the matter and the availability of the parties and arbitrator.

This time saving translates directly into reduced stress and uncertainty for families. Rather than spending years with their financial futures in limbo, parties can achieve resolution and move forward with their lives far more quickly.

Substantial Cost Savings

Litigation is expensive. Parties who proceed to final hearing in family law matters can expect to pay anywhere from $60,000 to $150,000 or more in legal costs. When you consider the cost of family lawyers in Australia, extended court processes multiply these expenses dramatically through multiple interim hearings, extensive document preparation, and ongoing case management requirements.

Arbitration typically costs substantially less because of the streamlined procedures, faster resolution, and reduced number of appearances required. While parties still need legal representation and must pay the arbitrator’s fees, the overall expenditure is generally a fraction of what full litigation would cost.

Flexibility and Party Control

Unlike court proceedings, where processes are governed by rigid rules and court availability, arbitration offers remarkable flexibility. Parties can choose their arbitrator, select hearing dates that suit their schedules, determine the location of the hearing, and tailor procedures to match the specific requirements of their dispute.

This party autonomy extends to the scope of the arbitration itself. Parties can choose to arbitrate specific discrete issues while reserving others for negotiation or, if necessary, court determination. This targeted approach can be particularly useful when parties have largely agreed on most matters but remain in dispute over one or two specific issues.

Privacy and Confidentiality

Court proceedings are generally public, meaning that details of parties’ financial affairs and personal circumstances can become part of the public record. Arbitration, by contrast, is entirely private. Documents produced for arbitration must only be used for the purposes of the arbitration and cannot be disclosed to others without court permission.

For business owners, high-net-worth individuals, or anyone who values their privacy, this confidentiality can be extremely valuable. It allows disputes to be resolved without the exposure and potential reputational consequences that can accompany public court proceedings.

Expert Decision-Making

When parties arbitrate their dispute, they benefit from having their matter determined by a senior family law specialist with specific expertise in the issues at hand. Unlike court, where cases are allocated to available judges who may have varying degrees of experience in family law, arbitration allows parties to select a decision-maker whose background matches the requirements of their particular dispute.

This is particularly valuable for complex matters involving business valuations, trust structures, international assets, or sophisticated financial arrangements where specialised knowledge can significantly improve the quality of the decision.

The Reality of Court Delays in Australia

To fully appreciate why arbitration has become such an attractive option, it helps to understand the current state of the family court system. The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia faces significant backlogs that directly impact families waiting for resolution of their disputes.

According to data from the Law Council of Australia, the Federal Circuit Court has struggled to meet its target of disposing 90% of final order applications within 12 months. In some registries, final hearing dates are not available for 18 months to two years or more from the filing of an application. This means that from the time you first lodge your court application, you may wait two to three years before a judge hears and decides your matter.

During this extended waiting period, parties remain in financial limbo. Assets cannot be properly divided, property may need to be maintained jointly despite the relationship having ended, and both parties face ongoing uncertainty about their financial futures. The emotional toll of prolonged litigation should not be underestimated. Years of legal proceedings can affect mental health, strain new relationships, and impact children caught in the middle of parental disputes.

The costs compound over time as well. Each interim hearing, each direction hearing, each exchange of correspondence between solicitors adds to the legal bill. By the time a matter reaches final hearing after two or three years of preparation, the cumulative costs can be staggering and may consume a significant portion of the assets being disputed.

When Arbitration May Not Be Appropriate

While arbitration offers many advantages, it is not suitable for every situation. The process requires the genuine consent of both parties. If one party refuses to participate, arbitration cannot proceed, and court intervention may be necessary.

Arbitration is also limited to financial matters. As noted earlier, disputes concerning children cannot be arbitrated and must be resolved through the court system, where the court maintains its supervisory jurisdiction over arrangements affecting children’s welfare.

Additionally, in cases involving family violence or significant power imbalances between parties, careful consideration must be given to whether arbitration can provide adequate protections. In some circumstances, the procedural safeguards of the court system may be more appropriate. If you are experiencing family violence, support is available through 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or Lifeline on 13 11 14.

Practical Considerations Before Choosing Arbitration

Before committing to arbitration, there are several practical factors worth considering to ensure it is the right choice for your circumstances.

Firstly, both parties must be willing to engage in good faith with the process. While arbitration requires consent, that consent must be genuine and informed. If one party is likely to withdraw partway through or refuses to provide proper disclosure of their financial circumstances, arbitration may not be effective.

Secondly, you should consider the nature of your dispute. Arbitration works best when the issues are clearly defined and the relevant evidence can be gathered efficiently. If your matter involves complex tracing exercises spanning decades, or requires extensive forensic accounting work, you will need to factor in the time and cost of this preparation regardless of whether you proceed through arbitration or court.

Thirdly, consider whether you require urgent interim orders. Courts have the power to make urgent orders protecting assets, requiring the payment of child support or spousal maintenance, and restraining parties from certain conduct. While arbitrators can make determinations on financial matters, some protective orders may still require court involvement.

Finally, think about the precedent implications of your dispute. Court decisions contribute to the body of family law jurisprudence and can guide future cases. Arbitration awards, being private, do not have this precedent-setting function. For most parties, this is immaterial. However, if your case involves novel legal questions where a court ruling might benefit others in similar situations, this may be a factor to weigh.

How Arbitration Awards Become Enforceable

Once an arbitrator delivers their award, either party can apply to register it with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. The registration process is governed by section 13H of the Family Law Act 1975 and the associated court rules.

Upon registration, an arbitration award has the same effect as a court order. This means that if one party fails to comply with the terms of the registered award, the other party can seek enforcement through the court in the same manner as they would enforce any other family law order. The court has extensive powers to ensure compliance, including the ability to make costs orders, impose penalties, and vary arrangements to secure performance.

There are limited grounds upon which a registered award can be reviewed or set aside. Section 13J of the Family Law Act allows for review on questions of law, while section 13K permits the court to vary or set aside awards in circumstances similar to those that would justify varying court orders, such as demonstrated fraud, bias, or where the award has become impractical to perform.

Comparing Arbitration with Other Dispute Resolution Options

Understanding how arbitration compares with other resolution pathways can help you determine whether it is right for your situation.

Family mediation involves a neutral mediator facilitating negotiations between parties to help them reach their own agreement. Mediation is collaborative and preserves party control over outcomes, making it an excellent first step in many disputes. However, mediation cannot produce a binding outcome unless parties reach agreement, which may not be possible in all cases.

Consent orders formalise agreements that parties have reached through negotiation or mediation. They require both parties to agree on terms and then seek court approval. While efficient, consent orders require agreement, which is not always achievable.

A binding financial agreement is a contract between parties that can be made before, during, or after a relationship. These agreements do not require court approval but must comply with strict technical requirements and each party must receive independent legal advice.

Arbitration occupies the space between collaborative processes like mediation and fully contested litigation. It provides a binding determination when parties cannot agree while avoiding the delays and costs associated with court proceedings.

Taking the Next Step

If you are facing a complex family law financial dispute and traditional negotiation has not achieved resolution, arbitration may offer the faster, more cost-effective, and private pathway you need. The combination of binding determination by an expert decision-maker, procedural flexibility, and significantly reduced timeframes makes it an increasingly attractive option for separating couples across Australia.

The first step is to explore whether arbitration is suitable for your circumstances. Speaking with an experienced family law professional can help you understand your options and determine the most appropriate pathway to resolution. At Mediations Australia, our team can guide you through the alternatives available and help you make an informed decision about the best way forward for your particular situation.

Don’t let your dispute drag on for years in an overburdened court system. Explore arbitration and take control of your path to resolution.

Imagine you’re going through a separation, and your former partner has already withdrawn substantial funds from joint accounts or sold assets without your agreement. Under the old system, you might have expected the Court to simply “add back” those amounts to the property pool, treating them as if they still existed. After the landmark Full Court decision in Shinohara & Shinohara [2025] FedCFamC1A 126, that approach is no longer available.

This decision, delivered on 23 July 2025, has fundamentally transformed how property settlements in family law are determined in Australia. For separating couples, understanding these changes is crucial—not just for Court proceedings, but especially for those seeking to resolve matters through mediation, where the new legal framework directly shapes what outcomes are achievable.

What Were Add-Backs?

Before the Family Law Amendment Act 2024 came into effect on 10 June 2025, the Courts applied a well-established practice known as “add-backs.” This concept allowed judges to notionally restore assets to the property pool even though those assets no longer existed at the time of trial.

The Full Court case of Omacini & Omacini (2005) FLC 93-218 identified three distinct categories of add-backs:

• Legal fees: Where one party paid legal costs from joint or individual assets
• Wastage: Reckless, negligent, or wanton dissipation of assets, such as gambling losses or extravagant spending
• Premature distribution: Early distribution of matrimonial property before formal settlement

The practical effect was significant. If your former partner had spent $100,000 from joint savings before trial, the Court could treat that amount as if it still existed in the pool. The spending party would then receive a reduced share of the actual remaining assets to account for what they had already taken.

This mathematical “fix” provided a relatively straightforward mechanism for addressing perceived unfairness when assets disappeared during separation.

The Family Law Amendment Act 2024: A Fundamental Shift

The amendments to the Family Law Act 1975 that commenced on 10 June 2025 introduced sweeping changes to property settlement law. Among the most significant was the rewording of section 79, which governs how Courts determine property settlements.

Under the new section 79(3)(a)(i), the Court must now identify “the existing legal and equitable rights and interests in any property of the parties to the marriage or either of them.”

The critical word is “existing.” According to the Attorney-General’s Department fact sheet, this language was deliberately chosen to limit the property pool to assets that actually exist at the time of trial—not notional or historical assets that have since been disposed of.

The amendments also codify the four-step Stanford pathway that Courts have traditionally followed, while integrating enhanced recognition of family violence and its economic impacts into the assessment framework.

The Shinohara Decision: Confirming the End of Add-Backs

Background of the Case

The parties in Shinohara had a relatively short marriage of approximately five years. Following separation, they sold investment properties and their former matrimonial home. The proceeds from these sales were used to pay legal fees and other expenses.

By the time of trial, the parties had agreed to record approximately $592,768 as “add-backs” on their balance sheet—$239,992 received by the father and $352,776 by the mother. The remaining pool available for distribution was approximately $589,155 (excluding superannuation, which was to be divided separately).

The primary judge at first instance did not include the notional add-backs in the asset pool, limiting the division to assets that existed at trial. This effectively halved the pool that the parties had expected to divide.

The Full Court’s Ruling

On appeal, the Full Court (Justices Williams, Altobelli, and Campton) delivered a unanimous judgment that, while allowing the appeal on procedural fairness grounds, definitively confirmed the legislative abolition of add-backs.

The Court stated unequivocally at paragraph 121:

“The text of s 79(3)(a)(i) is clear. Only the existing property of the parties is to be identified and only that existing property is to be divided or adjusted.”

This means that if money has been spent, assets sold, or property otherwise disposed of before trial, those amounts cannot be artificially restored to the pool. What exists is what gets divided.

How Dissipated Assets Are Now Treated

While add-backs as a balance sheet entry are abolished, the Full Court clarified that dissipated assets remain relevant—just through a different mechanism. At paragraph 149, the Court explained:

“So that it is clear, s 79 now directs that the categories identified in Omacini pre-amendment that were notionally added back are to be considered in ensuring a just and equitable outcome, either by way of historical contributions, or by way of their relationship to and impact upon the current and future circumstances at the s 79(5) stage.”

In practical terms, this means:

Under section 79(4) (Contributions): The Court can discount the contributions of a party who wasted or dissipated assets. If your former partner squandered $100,000 through gambling, this negatively affected their contributions to the relationship and can result in a percentage adjustment in your favour.

Under section 79(5) (Current and Future Circumstances): The Court can consider how the dissipation of assets has impacted each party’s current financial position and future needs. A party who has already received a benefit from spent funds may have their needs assessment adjusted accordingly.

Practical Implications for Separating Couples

Why This Matters for Your Settlement

The abolition of add-backs has profound implications for anyone navigating property settlement, whether through the Courts or, preferably, through mediation.

Financial decisions now carry permanent consequences. Money spent during separation cannot be mathematically restored. Parties can no longer assume that a mediator or judge will simply “add back” funds to equalise the pool.

Record-keeping is more critical than ever. Without the add-back mechanism, you must demonstrate exactly how dissipated assets should affect contributions or needs assessments. This requires detailed evidence of:

• When assets were disposed of
• Whether the disposal was agreed upon or unilateral
• How proceeds were used
• The impact on the overall pool composition

Early protective action may be essential. Since assets cannot be notionally restored, parties concerned about dissipation should consider seeking urgent Court orders such as asset preservation injunctions or interim property orders before funds disappear.

Why Mediation Is More Important Than Ever

The Shinohara decision and the 2025 amendments make family law mediation an even more attractive option for resolving property disputes.

Cost-effectiveness becomes paramount. Under the new framework, legal fees paid from joint assets cannot be added back. Every dollar spent on litigation permanently reduces the pool available for division. Mediation typically costs a fraction of Court proceedings, preserving more assets for both parties.

Speed protects the asset pool. Court proceedings can take months or years. During that time, assets can be depleted through ordinary living expenses, legal costs, or deliberate dissipation. Mediation can often resolve matters in days or weeks, capturing the pool at its highest value.

Control over outcomes remains with the parties. In Court, judges must apply the new legislative framework strictly. In mediation, parties retain flexibility to reach creative agreements that acknowledge past asset movements in ways that feel fair to both sides—provided the overall outcome is just and equitable.

Preservation of relationships. The adversarial nature of litigation often exacerbates conflict. Mediation’s collaborative approach helps preserve co-parenting relationships and reduces emotional harm.

At Mediations Australia, our experienced family mediators understand the implications of the Shinohara decision and can help you navigate the new property settlement landscape to achieve an outcome that works for your unique circumstances.

Practical Steps to Protect Your Position

Immediately After Separation

1. Document the asset pool. Create a comprehensive record of all assets and liabilities as they existed at separation, including bank statements, superannuation valuations, property appraisals, and business accounts.
2. Monitor financial movements. Keep records of any asset sales, withdrawals, or expenditure by either party following separation.
3. Consider protective measures. If you have genuine concerns about asset dissipation, seek urgent legal advice about injunctions or caveats on property.
4. Engage in mediation early. The sooner you commence resolution discussions, the more likely you are to preserve assets for division.

Preparing for Settlement Negotiations

Whether proceeding through mediation or Court, you must now be prepared to address dissipated assets within the contributions and needs framework rather than as balance sheet add-backs. This requires:

• Evidence demonstrating the timing and circumstances of asset disposals
• Arguments about how dissipation should affect contribution percentages
• Analysis of how each party’s current and future circumstances have been impacted

An experienced family mediator can help structure these discussions productively and guide both parties toward mutually acceptable solutions.

Formalising Your Agreement

Once you reach agreement through mediation, it is essential to formalise the outcome to ensure it is legally binding and enforceable. The two primary options are:

Consent Orders: These are orders made by the Court with the consent of both parties. They carry the full force of Court orders and can include property division, superannuation splitting, and spousal maintenance arrangements. The Court must be satisfied that the orders are just and equitable under the new section 79 framework.

Binding Financial Agreements: These are private contracts between the parties that do not require Court approval. Each party must receive independent legal advice, and the agreement must comply with strict formal requirements under Part VIIIA of the Family Law Act.

Your mediator can explain the advantages and limitations of each option and help you prepare for the next steps in formalising your agreement.

Looking Ahead: Adapting to the New Landscape

The Shinohara decision represents a watershed moment in Australian family law. For practitioners, litigants, and separating couples alike, the message is clear: the rules have changed, and strategies must adapt accordingly.

For those entering separation now, the key takeaways are:

• Act promptly to document and protect assets
• Maintain detailed records of all financial transactions
• Choose mediation to minimise costs and preserve the asset pool
• Understand the new framework when negotiating settlements
• Seek professional guidance from mediators and lawyers who understand the 2025 amendments

The abolition of add-backs does not mean that fairness is impossible to achieve—only that the pathway to fairness has changed. Through careful preparation, informed negotiation, and the collaborative process of mediation, separating couples can still reach outcomes that appropriately recognise each party’s contributions and needs.

How Mediations Australia Can Help

At Mediations Australia, we specialise in helping separating couples resolve property settlement disputes quickly, cost-effectively, and fairly. Our nationally accredited mediators are fully across the implications of the Shinohara decision and the 2025 Family Law Act amendments.

We offer flexible mediation services including:

• Online mediation for convenience and accessibility
• Shuttle mediation where direct communication is difficult
• Legally-assisted mediation where parties wish to have lawyers present

Our goal is simple: to help you resolve your dispute faster, better, and cheaper than litigation while achieving an outcome that is fair and workable for both parties.

If you are navigating property settlement following separation and want to understand how the Shinohara decision affects your situation, contact Mediations Australia today for a confidential discussion.

Every year, approximately 49,000 divorces are granted in Australia, and countless more de facto relationships come to an end. If you’re contemplating or navigating separation, you’re facing one of life’s most challenging transitions. The decisions you make now will shape your financial security, your relationship with your children, and your emotional wellbeing for years to come.

The good news? How you separate matters just as much as whether you separate. With the right approach, you can protect what matters most while laying the foundation for a healthier future. Family mediation offers a pathway that’s faster, more affordable, and less emotionally damaging than traditional litigation—and it puts you in control of the outcome.

This comprehensive guide walks you through everything you need to know about separating well in Australia, including the 2025 family law changes that may affect your situation.

Understanding Separation in Australia

What Does Separation Actually Mean?

Under Australian family law, separation occurs when one or both parties decide the relationship has ended and act on that decision. There’s no formal registration process or paperwork required—you simply need to:

1. Make the decision to separate
2. Act on that decision by changing the nature of your relationship
3. Communicate the decision to your partner

The date of separation is legally significant because it triggers important time limits. For married couples seeking divorce, you must be separated for at least 12 months and one day before you can apply. For de facto couples pursuing property settlement through the courts, there’s a two-year time limit from separation to make an application.

Separation Under One Roof

Financial pressures, housing availability, and family circumstances mean many couples continue living in the same home after deciding to separate. This is legally recognised in Australia as separation under one roof.

However, if you later apply for divorce while still living together (or having lived together during the separation period), you’ll need to provide evidence that the relationship genuinely ended. This typically requires an affidavit from both you and an independent witness—such as a friend, family member, or neighbour—confirming that:

• You occupy separate bedrooms
• You no longer share household duties as a couple
• You’ve told family and friends about the separation
• Social and financial arrangements have changed
• The intimate relationship has ended

The Emotional Journey: Understanding the Grief Cycle

Separation triggers a grief response similar to other major losses. Understanding this process helps you navigate it with greater self-awareness and patience.

The Stages of Grief in Separation

Research on grief, including the widely-recognised Kübler-Ross model, identifies several stages people typically experience:

Denial — Initial disbelief that the relationship is truly ending. You might find yourself thinking “this can’t really be happening” or hoping things will somehow return to normal.

Anger — Frustration emerges, often directed at your partner, yourself, or circumstances. This is a natural response to the pain and disruption.

Bargaining — Attempting to negotiate or make deals, either with your partner or internally. “If only we had…” or “Maybe if I change…”

Depression — Deep sadness as the reality of the loss settles in. This stage often involves withdrawal and difficulty with daily functioning.

Acceptance — Gradually coming to terms with the new reality and beginning to move forward.

Why This Matters for Your Separation

Understanding these stages serves several critical purposes:

Different timelines — If you initiated the separation, you may have already processed much of this grief. Your partner might be encountering it for the first time when you raise the topic. This emotional gap can create significant friction if not acknowledged.

Better communication — Recognising which stage you or your partner are experiencing helps you choose appropriate timing for important conversations and decisions.

Avoiding escalation — Actions taken during the anger phase can permanently damage co-parenting relationships and complicate negotiations. Awareness allows you to pause when emotions are running high.

Realistic expectations — Grief isn’t linear. You might feel you’ve reached acceptance, then find yourself unexpectedly back in anger or sadness. This is normal.

Your First Steps: Practical Preparation

Gather Essential Information

Before having the separation conversation or making any major decisions, take time to understand your situation:

Financial documents:

• Recent tax returns for both parties
• Bank statements (joint and individual)
• Superannuation statements
• Mortgage documents and property valuations
• Vehicle registrations
• Credit card statements and loan documents
• Business financial records (if applicable)
• Investment portfolios

Personal documents:

• Birth certificates (yours and any children)
• Marriage certificate
• Passports
• Medicare cards
• Insurance policies
• Wills and powers of attorney

This isn’t about hiding information—full financial disclosure is now a statutory requirement under the Family Law Act 1975 following the June 2025 amendments. However, understanding your financial position helps you make informed decisions and ensures important documents don’t go missing during an emotionally charged time.

Seek Support Early

Separation affects every aspect of your life. Building your support network early makes the journey significantly more manageable:

Personal support:

• Trusted friends and family members
• Support groups for separating couples
• Online communities for people in similar situations

Professional support:

• Individual counsellor or psychologist
• Financial advisor
• Family dispute resolution practitioner

The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia recognises that separation is one of the most stressful life events and provides links to mental health resources. Services like Beyond Blue (1300 22 4636), Lifeline (13 11 14), and MensLine Australia (1300 78 99 78) offer 24/7 support.

Update Your Will and Estate Planning

Many people don’t realise that your will doesn’t automatically change when you separate. If something happened to you before your divorce is finalised, your estranged spouse could still inherit under your current will or intestacy laws.

Priority tasks include:

• Reviewing and updating your will
• Checking superannuation beneficiary nominations
• Reviewing powers of attorney
• Updating insurance beneficiaries

The Conversation: How to Tell Your Partner

How you communicate about separation sets the tone for everything that follows.

Timing and Setting

Choose a time when:

• You won’t be interrupted
• Neither of you needs to rush off afterwards
• Children aren’t present
• You’re both relatively calm and rested
• Important decisions don’t need to be made immediately afterward

What to Say

Be honest but compassionate. Avoid blame language and focus on your own feelings and decisions:

Instead of: “You’ve made this marriage impossible.” Try: “I’ve come to the decision that our relationship isn’t working for me.”

Instead of: “You never made any effort.” Try: “I believe we want different things from life.”

Be prepared that your partner may:

• Be shocked and need time to process
• React with anger or denial
• Want to discuss it extensively
• Ask for time to respond

If You’re on the Receiving End

Finding out your partner wants to separate can be devastating, even if you sensed problems in the relationship. Give yourself permission to:

• Ask for time to process before discussing details
• Seek support from friends, family, or a counsellor
• Request a follow-up conversation once the initial shock subsides

Resolving Disputes: Why Mediation Should Be Your First Choice

Once you’ve decided to separate, you’ll need to resolve practical matters including:

• Parenting arrangements for any children
• Division of property and assets
• Spousal maintenance (if applicable)
• Debt allocation

You have several pathways available, but mediation consistently delivers better outcomes for separating families.

The Cost of Going to Court

The Federal Circuit and Family Court itself states that “court proceedings should be a last resort” and expects parties to make genuine attempts at dispute resolution. Here’s why:

Financial impact:

• Family law litigation typically costs $50,000 to $200,000 or more per party
• Contested matters can take two to four years to resolve
• Court filing fees alone exceed $400 for initiating applications
• Expert reports, barristers, and multiple hearing dates add substantially to costs

Emotional toll:

• Adversarial processes encourage conflict rather than cooperation
• Court delays mean years of uncertainty
• Public records of family disputes
• Damaged relationships between parents affect children long-term

Loss of control:

• A judge who doesn’t know your family makes binding decisions
• Outcomes may not suit either party’s preferences
• Creative solutions that work for your specific situation aren’t available

The Mediation Advantage

Family dispute resolution (FDR) offers a fundamentally different approach:

You stay in control — Rather than having a judge impose decisions, you and your former partner work together to create solutions that fit your family’s unique needs.

Faster resolution — Most mediated agreements are reached in one to three sessions, compared to years of court proceedings.

Significant cost savings — Mediation typically costs a fraction of litigation, preserving family resources for the future.

Confidential process — Unlike court proceedings, mediation discussions remain private.

Better long-term relationships — The collaborative nature of mediation helps establish healthier communication patterns for ongoing co-parenting.

Higher compliance — People are far more likely to follow through on agreements they helped create than orders imposed by a court.

When Mediation is Required

Under section 60I of the Family Law Act 1975, you must attempt family dispute resolution before applying to court for parenting orders, unless an exemption applies. Exemptions include situations involving:

• Family violence or child abuse allegations
• Urgent matters requiring immediate court intervention
• Risk of harm to a child or party

An accredited FDR practitioner can assess whether mediation is appropriate for your circumstances and issue a Section 60I certificate if needed for court.

What Happens in Mediation?

The mediation process typically follows these stages:

Intake and assessment — The mediator meets with each party separately to understand the issues, assess suitability for mediation, and screen for family violence or other safety concerns.

Joint session(s) — Both parties meet with the mediator (either in person, online, or via shuttle mediation if face-to-face isn’t appropriate). The mediator facilitates discussion, helps identify interests and needs, and guides you toward mutually acceptable solutions.

Agreement — If you reach agreement, the mediator documents the terms. This can form the basis of a parenting plan, or be formalised through consent orders or a binding financial agreement.

Key Decisions: Children

If you have children, their wellbeing must be your paramount consideration. Australian family law uses this exact phrase—”the best interests of the child” is the overriding principle in all parenting decisions.

Creating a Parenting Plan

A parenting plan is a written agreement between parents covering:

• Where children will live
• How time will be shared between parents
• How decisions about education, health, and religion will be made
• Communication arrangements (phone, video calls)
• Arrangements for special occasions (birthdays, holidays, school events)
• Handover logistics
• How changes to arrangements will be managed

While parenting plans aren’t legally enforceable in themselves, they’re recognised under the Family Law Act and demonstrate your commitment to cooperative co-parenting. Many families find them sufficient for managing ongoing arrangements.

Parenting Orders

For situations requiring legally binding arrangements, parenting orders made by a court (including consent orders agreed in mediation) are enforceable. Breaching a parenting order can result in serious consequences.

Supporting Your Children

Children experience separation differently depending on their age, temperament, and the level of conflict between parents. Research consistently shows that children’s adjustment depends less on the separation itself and more on:

• The level of ongoing conflict they’re exposed to
• The quality of their relationship with both parents
• Stability in their daily routines
• How parents communicate about each other

Practical ways to support your children include:

• Never disparaging their other parent in front of them
• Protecting them from adult conflict and legal proceedings
• Maintaining consistent routines as much as possible
• Allowing them to love both parents without guilt
• Seeking professional support if they’re struggling

Family Relationships Online offers resources specifically designed to help children understand and cope with their parents’ separation.

Key Decisions: Property and Finances

How Property Division Works in Australia

Property settlement doesn’t follow a simple 50/50 formula. The Family Law Act prescribes a four-step process:

Step 1: Identify the asset pool — All assets and liabilities of both parties are identified and valued, regardless of whose name they’re in. This includes property, superannuation, investments, vehicles, business interests, and debts.

Step 2: Assess contributions — The court considers financial contributions (income, assets brought to the relationship), non-financial contributions (renovations, business development), and contributions to family welfare (homemaking, childcare).

Step 3: Consider future needs — Factors include age and health of each party, income-earning capacity, care of children, and the duration of the relationship.

Step 4: Just and equitable assessment — The court steps back and considers whether the proposed division is fair in all the circumstances.

2025 Family Law Changes

The Family Law Amendment Act 2024, which came into effect on 10 June 2025, introduced several significant changes:

Economic impact of family violence — Courts must now specifically consider how family violence (including financial abuse) has affected each party’s financial circumstances.

Statutory duty of disclosure — The requirement to provide full and frank financial disclosure is now embedded in legislation, not just court rules. Non-disclosure can result in costs orders and other consequences.

Companion animals — New provisions specifically address family pets, recognising their emotional significance. Courts can make orders about pet ownership based on who purchased and cared for the animal.

Simplified divorce for short marriages — The requirement for couples married less than two years to attend counselling before divorcing has been removed.

Formalising Your Property Agreement

Once you reach agreement on property division, you have several options to make it legally binding:

Consent orders — These are court orders made with both parties’ agreement. They provide finality and prevent future claims. The court must be satisfied the orders are just and equitable.

Binding financial agreements — Also known as financial agreements or “prenups”, these are contracts between parties. Each party must receive independent legal advice before signing.

Both options require proper legal formalities. Attempting DIY property settlement without appropriate documentation leaves you vulnerable to future claims.

Time Limits

There are strict time limits for property settlement claims:

• Married couples: 12 months from the date of divorce
• De facto couples: Two years from the date of separation

If these deadlines pass, you need the court’s permission to proceed—which isn’t guaranteed.

Divorce: The Formal End of Marriage

Divorce is the legal process that ends a marriage. It’s separate from property settlement and parenting arrangements—you can finalise those matters before, during, or after divorce.

Requirements for Divorce in Australia

To apply for divorce, you must demonstrate that:

• Your marriage has broken down irretrievably (the only ground for divorce)
• You’ve been separated for at least 12 months and one day
• One of you is an Australian citizen, resident, or considers Australia home

If you have children under 18, you must satisfy the court that proper arrangements have been made for their care, welfare, and development.

The Divorce Process

Applying for divorce is primarily an administrative process:

1. Complete the online application through the Federal Circuit and Family Court portal
2. Pay the filing fee (currently $1,125, or $375 with concession)
3. If applying alone, arrange service on your spouse
4. Attend the hearing (often conducted electronically and lasting only minutes)
5. Wait for the divorce order to take effect (one month and one day after the hearing)

Joint applications, where both parties agree and apply together, are generally smoother as no service is required.

When Professional Help is Essential

While this guide provides a comprehensive overview, certain situations require professional assistance:

You Should Seek Legal Advice If:

• There are allegations of family violence
• Significant assets or complex financial structures are involved
• Your partner isn’t being transparent about finances
• You’re being pressured to sign agreements quickly
• There’s a power imbalance in your relationship
• International elements exist (overseas assets, different nationalities)
• You need to formalise agreements through consent orders or binding financial agreements

Mediation is Ideal For:

• Resolving parenting arrangements cooperatively
• Negotiating property division with goodwill on both sides
• Maintaining an ongoing relationship for co-parenting
• Avoiding the cost and delay of court proceedings
• Situations where both parties can participate safely

Safety First: When Mediation May Not Be Appropriate

Mediation isn’t suitable for every situation. If you’re experiencing family violence—physical, emotional, financial, or psychological—your safety must come first.

Warning signs include:

• Physical violence or threats
• Controlling behaviour around money, movement, or communication
• Intimidation or harassment
• Coercive control

If you’re in immediate danger, call 000.

For support and information:

• 1800RESPECT: 1800 737 732 (24/7 support for sexual assault and family violence)
• Lifeline: 13 11 14 (24/7 crisis support)
• Legal Aid: Available in each state and territory

Specialist family violence services can help you create a safety plan and understand your legal options.

Moving Forward: You Will Get Through This

Separation is undeniably difficult. The path forward often feels unclear, and the emotional weight can be overwhelming. But with time, support, and the right approach, most people not only survive separation—they discover unexpected positives.

Many former clients describe eventually finding:

• Greater clarity about their own needs and values
• Improved mental health after leaving a difficult relationship
• Better relationships with their children through focused parenting time
• New opportunities they couldn’t have pursued before
• The chance to model healthy conflict resolution for their children

The journey through separation isn’t linear. There will be setbacks, difficult days, and moments of doubt. But with each step forward—each decision made thoughtfully rather than reactively—you’re building the foundation for your next chapter.

Take the Next Step

If you’re contemplating or navigating separation, you don’t have to figure it out alone. Mediations Australia provides expert family dispute resolution services across Australia, helping separating couples resolve parenting and property matters efficiently and affordably.

Our nationally accredited mediators understand both the legal framework and the emotional complexity of separation. We offer flexible arrangements including online mediation, shuttle mediation for high-conflict situations, and evening appointments to fit around work and family commitments.

Ready to explore how mediation can help your situation? Contact us today to speak with our team about your circumstances and options.

Navigating child support after separation can feel overwhelming. While the administrative formula through Services Australia works for many families, some parents prefer to create their own tailored arrangements that better reflect their unique circumstances. A binding child support agreement offers this flexibility, providing certainty and predictability for both parents while ensuring children receive appropriate financial support.

At Mediations Australia, we help separating parents reach child support agreements through family dispute resolution, a faster and less stressful alternative to court proceedings. This comprehensive guide explains everything you need to know about binding child support agreements, including how they work, their legal requirements, and whether they’re the right choice for your family.

What Is a Binding Child Support Agreement?

A binding child support agreement is a formal, written contract between parents (or carers) that sets out how child support will be paid. Unlike the standard administrative assessment calculated by Services Australia, a binding agreement allows parents to determine their own child support arrangements, including amounts that may be higher or lower than the formula assessment.

These agreements are governed by the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 and specifically regulated under Section 80C, which sets out the strict legal requirements that must be met for an agreement to be valid and enforceable.

Key Characteristics of Binding Child Support Agreements in 2026

Binding child support agreements have several distinctive features that set them apart from other child support arrangements.

Flexibility in payment amounts: Unlike limited child support agreements, binding agreements can provide for payments that are less than, equal to, or greater than the formula assessment. This flexibility allows parents to account for specific circumstances such as private school fees, medical needs, or other expenses unique to their situation.

No requirement for prior assessment: You do not need a child support assessment from Services Australia before entering into a binding agreement, unless you wish to include lump sum provisions. This can streamline the process for parents who prefer private arrangements.

Enhanced enforceability: Once registered with Services Australia, binding agreements can be enforced through the child support collection system. They can also be registered with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia for additional enforcement options.

Limited ability to change: Unlike limited agreements, binding child support agreements cannot be varied once signed. The only ways to end or change a binding agreement are through mutual consent (by creating a new binding agreement or termination agreement), by court order in exceptional circumstances, or upon a terminating event.

Legal Requirements for a Valid Binding Child Support Agreement

For a binding child support agreement to be legally valid and enforceable, it must comply with strict requirements set out in Section 80C of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989.

Mandatory Requirements

Independent legal advice: Both parties must obtain independent legal advice from a legal practitioner before signing the agreement. The legal practitioner must advise each party about the effect of the agreement on their rights, and the advantages and disadvantages of making the agreement at the time the advice is provided.

Legal certificates: The agreement must include a certificate signed by each party’s legal practitioner confirming that independent legal advice was provided. Without these certificates, the agreement will not be accepted by Services Australia as binding.

Written and signed: The agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties.

Eligible carer requirement: To receive child support under a binding agreement, a parent or carer must have at least 35% care of the child.

What Must Be Included in the Agreement

A comprehensive binding child support agreement should address payment amounts (whether periodic, non-periodic, or lump sum), payment frequency and method, specific expenses to be covered (such as school fees, medical costs, or extracurricular activities), the duration of the agreement, and circumstances that may trigger review or termination.

Types of Child Support Arrangements Compared

Understanding the different types of child support arrangements available can help you determine which option best suits your circumstances.

Binding Child Support Agreement

This formal agreement requires independent legal advice for both parents and offers maximum flexibility in setting payment amounts. It can include periodic payments, lump sums, and non-periodic payments. However, it is difficult to change or terminate and requires either a new agreement signed by both parties or a court order.

Limited Child Support Agreement

A limited agreement does not require independent legal advice but must be based on an existing child support assessment from Services Australia. The agreed amount must be at least equal to the formula assessment. These agreements offer more flexibility as they can be terminated unilaterally after three years, if income changes by more than 15%, or by entering a new agreement.

Administrative Assessment

This is the standard child support arrangement where Services Australia calculates the amount payable using a formula based on parental incomes, care arrangements, and the costs of children. It is automatically adjusted when circumstances change but offers less flexibility for bespoke arrangements.

Private Arrangements

Informal agreements between parents that are not registered with Services Australia. While flexible, these arrangements are difficult to enforce if one party does not comply and may affect Family Tax Benefit eligibility.

Payment Options Within Binding Child Support Agreements

One significant advantage of binding child support agreements is the flexibility they offer in structuring payments.

Periodic Payments

Regular payments made weekly, fortnightly, or monthly. These can be managed privately between parents or collected through Services Australia’s Child Support Collect service.

Non-Periodic Payments

Direct payments for specific expenses such as private school fees, health insurance premiums, sporting activities, music lessons, or medical and dental costs. These payments can be made directly to service providers, ensuring children’s expenses are met while reducing the need for ongoing financial interaction between parents.

Lump Sum Payments

A binding agreement can include a one-time lump sum payment, including through the transfer of property (such as equity in the family home). Special requirements apply to lump sum provisions. You must have a child support assessment in place, the lump sum must equal or exceed the annual child support rate, and the lump sum will be credited against your child support liability annually until exhausted.

According to guidance from Services Australia, lump sum credits are indexed by CPI and reduce each year by the applicable child support rate until depleted.

How to Create a Binding Child Support Agreement

Creating a valid binding child support agreement involves several important steps.

Step 1: Consider Whether a Binding Agreement Is Right for You

Before pursuing a binding agreement, consider whether your circumstances genuinely require one. Binding agreements are most suitable when you want certainty and finality regarding child support arrangements, when you wish to include provisions not possible under a formula assessment (such as direct payments to schools or lump sums), when both parties have the capacity to negotiate fairly, and when circumstances are unlikely to change significantly before your child turns 18.

Step 2: Negotiate Terms Through Mediation

Working with an accredited family dispute resolution practitioner can help both parties negotiate fair terms in a structured, supportive environment. Mediation offers several advantages over attempting to negotiate directly or through litigation, including reduced cost compared to legal proceedings, faster resolution, confidentiality, preservation of parenting relationships, and greater flexibility in reaching creative solutions.

At Mediations Australia, our experienced mediators help parents reach child support agreements that prioritise children’s needs while respecting both parties’ circumstances. Learn more about preparing for mediation to get the most from your sessions.

Step 3: Obtain Independent Legal Advice

Both parties must receive independent legal advice from their own legal practitioner. This is a mandatory requirement under Section 80C of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989. Your lawyer must advise you on the effect of the agreement on your rights, and the advantages and disadvantages of entering the agreement.

Step 4: Sign the Agreement and Legal Certificates

Once both parties have received legal advice, the agreement is signed along with the required legal certificates. Each certificate must confirm that the relevant party received independent legal advice before signing.

Step 5: Register With Services Australia

Submit your signed agreement and legal certificates to Services Australia for acceptance. You can do this online through your Child Support account linked to myGov, by post using the Child Support Agreement form (CS1666), or by phone.

Services Australia will assess your agreement and advise whether it has been accepted. Once accepted, the agreement becomes enforceable through the child support system.

What Happens After Your Agreement Is Accepted

Once Services Australia accepts your binding child support agreement, several things occur.

Notional assessment: Services Australia will create a notional assessment, which is the formula-based assessment that would apply if your agreement were not in place. This notional assessment is used for certain purposes, including calculating Family Tax Benefit Part A entitlements.

Collection options: The receiving parent can choose between private collection (payments made directly between parents) or Child Support Collect (Services Australia collects and transfers payments).

Ongoing reviews: While the terms of your agreement cannot be varied, Services Australia will issue new notional assessments every three years or when the amount of child support under the agreement changes by more than 15%. Parents have 14 days to challenge these notional assessments.

How Binding Child Support Agreements End

Binding child support agreements can only be terminated in specific circumstances.

Terminating Events

A binding agreement automatically ends when the child turns 18 (or completes secondary school if they turn 18 during the school year and an extension is applied for), when the child dies, marries, or is adopted, when both parents cease to have at least 35% care and there is no non-parent carer entitled to receive child support, or when either parent or the child dies. For more detailed information, see our guide on when child support stops.

Termination by Agreement

Both parents can agree to terminate the agreement by entering into either a new binding child support agreement that replaces the existing one, or a termination agreement that ends child support obligations entirely. Both options require independent legal advice and legal certificates from each party.

Court Orders to Set Aside

A court can set aside a binding child support agreement under Section 136 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 in limited circumstances, including fraud or failure to disclose material information, undue influence, duress, or unconscionable conduct, or exceptional circumstances that have arisen since the agreement was made, causing hardship if the agreement is not set aside.

The “exceptional circumstances” ground is notoriously difficult to establish. Courts have interpreted this narrowly, requiring circumstances that are genuinely unforeseeable and cause significant hardship. For example, in the 2020 case of Martyn & Martyn, the Federal Circuit Court set aside a binding agreement where a parent’s business income had declined by 90% due to the COVID-19 pandemic, finding this constituted exceptional circumstances causing hardship.

Suspension Due to Care Changes

Under amendments introduced in 2018, a binding agreement may be suspended or terminated automatically if care arrangements change significantly. Specifically, if the receiving parent has less than 35% care of the child for at least 28 consecutive days or 26 weeks total, the agreement may be suspended or terminated by operation of law.

Impact on Family Tax Benefit

How child support is received affects Family Tax Benefit (FTB) Part A entitlements. The key point to understand is that FTB Part A is calculated based on the notional formula assessment rather than the amount actually payable under your binding agreement.

If your binding agreement provides for less than the formula assessment, your FTB Part A entitlement will be calculated as if you were receiving the full formula amount. This can result in lower FTB payments than you might expect. Conversely, if your agreement provides for more than the formula assessment, your FTB is still calculated on the notional assessment amount.

Understanding these interactions is important when negotiating your agreement. We recommend discussing this with both your mediator and legal advisor to ensure you understand the full financial implications.

Advantages of Binding Child Support Agreements

Binding child support agreements offer several significant benefits for separating parents.

Certainty and finality: Both parties know exactly what is expected, reducing ongoing conflict and providing financial predictability for planning purposes.

Flexibility: Agreements can be tailored to your specific circumstances, including provisions for private school fees, extracurricular activities, and other expenses not easily accommodated under the formula assessment.

Privacy: Unlike court proceedings, the terms of your agreement remain private between the parties.

Enforceability: Once registered, binding agreements can be enforced through Services Australia’s collection mechanisms or through the Family Court if necessary.

Inclusion in property settlements: Binding child support agreements can be negotiated alongside property settlements, allowing for comprehensive resolution of financial matters following separation.

Potential Disadvantages to Consider

While binding agreements offer significant benefits, they also have potential drawbacks that must be carefully considered.

Inflexibility: Once signed, a binding agreement cannot be varied without both parties’ consent or a court order. This can be problematic if circumstances change significantly, for example, if the paying parent loses their job or suffers a serious illness.

Legal costs: Both parties must obtain independent legal advice, which adds to the cost of finalising arrangements.

Complexity: The legal requirements for valid binding agreements are strict. If any requirement is not met, the agreement may be invalid.

Potential unfairness: If there is a significant power imbalance between parties, one party may agree to terms that are not in their best interests or their children’s best interests. The requirement for independent legal advice helps mitigate this risk, but does not eliminate it entirely.

Enforcement challenges: While binding agreements are legally enforceable, actually collecting unpaid child support can still be challenging and may require court action if Services Australia’s collection mechanisms are unsuccessful.

When Mediation Can Help

Family mediation and family dispute resolution provide an ideal pathway for negotiating child support agreements. According to the Attorney-General’s Department, family dispute resolution helps separating parents reach agreements about children and financial matters without the stress, expense, and delays of court proceedings.

Benefits of Mediating Child Support Agreements

Cost-effective: Mediation typically costs a fraction of legal proceedings, leaving more resources available to support your children.

Faster resolution: While court matters can take months or years, mediation often achieves resolution in just a few sessions.

Reduced conflict: Working together with a neutral mediator helps reduce hostility and builds a foundation for ongoing co-parenting cooperation.

Child-focused outcomes: Experienced mediators help parents focus on their children’s needs rather than their own disputes.

Preserved relationships: By avoiding adversarial proceedings, parents maintain a working relationship that benefits children long-term.

How Mediation Works for Child Support

During mediation at Mediations Australia, our accredited family dispute resolution practitioners facilitate discussions between parents to identify children’s financial needs, explore payment options and amounts, address specific expenses such as education and healthcare, negotiate fair and sustainable arrangements, and document agreed terms for inclusion in a binding agreement.

Once parents reach agreement through mediation, they can then obtain the required independent legal advice and formalise their arrangement as a binding child support agreement.

If you would prefer, agreements reached through mediation can also be converted into consent orders for court approval, providing another avenue for formalising your arrangements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a binding child support agreement provide for less than the formula assessment?

Yes. Unlike limited child support agreements, binding agreements can provide for any amount agreed between the parties, whether more or less than the administrative formula assessment.

Do I need a child support assessment before entering a binding agreement?

Generally, no. However, if you want to include lump sum provisions in your binding agreement, you must have a child support assessment in place first.

What if my ex-partner refuses to follow the binding agreement?

If your agreement is registered with Services Australia and your ex-partner fails to comply, Services Australia can take enforcement action including garnisheeing wages, intercepting tax refunds, and restricting their ability to leave Australia. You can also seek enforcement through the Federal Circuit and Family Court.

Can I change a binding child support agreement if my circumstances change?

Binding agreements cannot be varied. If you need to change the arrangement, both parties must agree to enter either a new binding agreement (with fresh legal advice and certificates) or a termination agreement. Alternatively, you may apply to the court to have the agreement set aside, but this requires proving exceptional circumstances causing hardship, which is a high threshold to meet.

How does child support affect my tax?

Child support payments are neither taxable income for the recipient nor tax-deductible for the payer. For more information, see our guide on child support payments and taxes.

When does child support stop under a binding agreement?

Child support generally ends when the child turns 18. If the child is still in full-time secondary education when they turn 18, an application can be made to extend child support until the end of the school year. The agreement may also end earlier due to other terminating events such as the child marrying or being adopted.

Getting Help With Your Child Support Agreement

Creating a binding child support agreement that properly protects your interests and your children’s needs requires careful consideration and expert guidance. At Mediations Australia, we offer professional family dispute resolution services to help separating parents negotiate fair and workable child support arrangements.

Our experienced mediators understand the complexities of child support law and can help you work through the issues in a supportive, neutral environment. We focus on achieving outcomes that prioritise your children’s wellbeing while respecting both parents’ circumstances.

Ready to explore whether a binding child support agreement is right for your situation? Contact Mediations Australia today to speak with one of our family mediation specialists. We offer flexible appointment times and online mediation options for families across Australia.

When you’re going through separation, few things create more anxiety than watching property values fluctuate while your settlement remains unresolved. That investment property you purchased together might have increased by $200,000 since you separated—or perhaps plummeted due to rising interest rates. Either way, you’re likely wondering: who benefits from these changes, and how will they affect what you ultimately receive?

Understanding how Australian family law treats property value fluctuations is essential for anyone navigating a property settlement after separation. The timing of valuations can significantly impact your financial outcome, making it crucial to understand the rules and, importantly, to resolve your property matters as efficiently as possible.

The Fundamental Principle: Valuation at Settlement, Not Separation

One of the most important concepts in Australian family law property settlements is that assets are typically valued at the time of settlement or final hearing, not at the date you separated.

This principle stems from the overarching objective of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) to achieve a just and equitable outcome. Under Section 79 of the Family Law Act, the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia assesses the “existing” property interests of the parties—meaning what exists at the time the court makes its determination.

The reasoning is straightforward: the property pool should reflect the most accurate and current picture of the parties’ financial circumstances at the point when their financial relationship is formally severed.

What This Means in Practice

If your family home was worth $1.2 million when you separated in 2023, but is valued at $1.5 million when you finalise your settlement in 2026, the court will generally use the $1.5 million figure. Conversely, if the property has declined to $1 million, that reduced value forms the basis of the division.

This approach applies whether you reach an agreement through family mediation, negotiate directly with your former partner, or proceed to a final hearing in court.

The Four-Step Property Settlement Process

Before examining how value changes affect outcomes, it’s helpful to understand the structured approach courts use when determining property division. The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia follows a four-step process:

Step 1: Identify and Value the Property Pool

All assets and liabilities of both parties are combined into a single pool, regardless of whose name they’re registered in. This includes real estate (family home, investment properties, land), superannuation, businesses and business interests, vehicles, savings, shares and investments, cryptocurrency and digital assets, and all debts including mortgages, loans, and credit cards.

Step 2: Assess Contributions

The court evaluates what each party contributed during the relationship. Financial contributions include income, savings, and inheritances. Non-financial contributions encompass renovations, business involvement, and property maintenance. Homemaker and parenting contributions—raising children and managing the household—are equally recognised.

Step 3: Consider Future Needs

Adjustments may be made based on factors like each party’s age and health, earning capacity, who has primary care of children, and ongoing financial needs.

Step 4: Ensure the Outcome is Just and Equitable

The court confirms that the proposed division is fair in all the circumstances. This final step provides flexibility to address unusual situations.

Throughout this process, accurate and current valuations are essential. Outdated figures can distort the entire settlement, which is why valuations are typically required to be no more than six months old when matters proceed to court.

Why Valuation at Settlement Makes Sense

The settlement-date approach serves several important purposes that promote fairness for both parties.

Reflecting Real Financial Circumstances

Property markets—particularly in cities like Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane—can shift dramatically over relatively short periods. If values were frozen at separation, one party could be significantly advantaged or disadvantaged by circumstances entirely beyond their control.

Consider this scenario: a couple separates in January when their Sydney apartment is worth $900,000. By the time their matter is resolved eighteen months later, a market boom has pushed the value to $1.1 million. If the separation-date value were used, the party retaining the property would receive a $200,000 windfall that the other party couldn’t share in.

Preventing Strategic Behaviour

If valuations were fixed at an earlier date, a party might deliberately delay proceedings to benefit from anticipated market movements. Using settlement-date values removes the incentive for such tactics.

Courts are alert to strategic delays. In the case of Halstron & Halstron [2022], the Full Court addressed a situation where there was almost 12 months between the trial and judgment delivery. When one party sought to exclude updated property valuations, the Court found this would create an unfair “fortuitous windfall.”

Maintaining Shared Responsibility

Until settlement is finalised, both parties remain financially connected to the assets. Using current values ensures that market-driven changes—whether gains or losses—are shared equitably, rather than arbitrarily benefiting one party over the other.

How Different Value Changes Affect Your Settlement

Understanding the practical implications of value fluctuations helps you make informed decisions about timing and strategy.

When Property Values Increase

An increase in property values expands the overall pool, which typically means the party who doesn’t retain the property receives a larger dollar amount. For example, if a property increases from $800,000 to $1 million and the agreed split is 60/40, the non-retaining party’s share increases from $320,000 to $400,000.

This can create challenges for the party retaining the property, who may need to refinance at a higher amount or find additional funds to pay out their former partner.

When Property Values Decrease

A decline reduces the pool size, meaning both parties share in the loss. If that same property drops from $800,000 to $650,000, the 60/40 split would give the non-retaining party $260,000 rather than $320,000.

While this feels unfair to the party receiving less, it’s equally difficult for the retaining party who now holds a diminished asset—often while still carrying the same mortgage obligations.

The Critical Exception: Post-Separation Contributions

The general rule of shared gains and losses has an important exception. If one party has actively contributed to changing an asset’s value after separation, the court may adjust the outcome accordingly.

For instance, if one party used their own funds to renovate a property after separation, increasing its value by $100,000, the court may recognise this as a post-separation contribution and adjust their entitlement accordingly. Similarly, if one party’s neglect caused a property to deteriorate, this may be reflected in the contributions assessment.

This is distinct from passive market changes, which are typically shared regardless of who retained physical possession of the asset.

Common Causes of Property Value Fluctuations

Several factors can cause property values to shift between separation and settlement.

Market conditions represent the most common cause. Interest rate changes, economic cycles, supply and demand dynamics, and government policy all influence property prices. The significant interest rate increases since 2022, for example, have affected property values across many Australian markets.

Property condition also matters. A well-maintained property will hold its value better than one that’s been neglected. Improvements and renovations can increase value, while deferred maintenance can cause decline.

External factors beyond anyone’s control—natural disasters, infrastructure changes, rezoning decisions—can dramatically affect values in specific locations.

Business assets present particular volatility. A family business might flourish or struggle in the period between separation and settlement, with corresponding impacts on its valuation.

The Case for Resolving Property Matters Promptly Through Mediation

Given that property values can change significantly over time, there’s a compelling argument for resolving your property settlement as efficiently as possible. This is where mediation offers substantial advantages over protracted court proceedings.

Speed and Certainty

Court proceedings for property matters can take two to three years or longer to reach a final hearing. During this time, property values may fluctuate significantly, creating ongoing uncertainty about the ultimate outcome.

Mediation, by contrast, can often achieve resolution within weeks or a few months. Once you reach agreement and formalise it through consent orders or a binding financial agreement, you have certainty about your entitlements regardless of subsequent market movements.

Control Over Timing

In mediation, you and your former partner control when valuations are obtained and when agreements are finalised. This allows you to make strategic decisions about timing based on your assessment of market conditions and your individual circumstances.

In court proceedings, timing is largely dictated by court schedules and procedural requirements, leaving you exposed to market fluctuations you cannot control.

Cost Savings

Legal costs in contested court proceedings can be substantial—often $50,000 to $150,000 or more per party for complex property matters. These costs reduce the pool available for distribution.

Mediation is significantly more cost-effective, preserving more of the asset pool for both parties. The Federal Circuit and Family Court actively encourages parties to attempt mediation before and during proceedings.

Preserving Relationships

If you have children together or ongoing connections, the adversarial nature of litigation can cause lasting damage. Mediation provides a more constructive environment for reaching agreements, which can benefit your co-parenting relationship and your children’s wellbeing.

For detailed guidance on making the most of the mediation process, see our article on preparing for mediation.

What Happens When Your Former Partner Delays

Unfortunately, not everyone is motivated to resolve property matters promptly. If your former partner is delaying the property settlement, you face the risk of ongoing value fluctuations affecting your entitlement.

Courts recognise this problem. If one party unreasonably delays proceedings, this conduct may be considered when assessing contributions or determining costs. However, you need to take proactive steps to demonstrate you’ve attempted to progress the matter.

Options include formally proposing mediation in writing, making written settlement offers, initiating court proceedings if necessary, and applying for interim orders to protect assets if there’s a risk of dissipation.

The court may also “add back” funds if one party has wasted assets during the period of delay—though this is discretionary and depends on the specific circumstances.

Protecting Yourself from Adverse Value Changes

While you cannot control market movements, you can take steps to manage the risks associated with property value changes.

Obtain Current Valuations

When negotiating or mediating, ensure you have up-to-date valuations from qualified valuers. For court proceedings, the Federal Circuit and Family Court generally requires valuations no more than six months old.

Real estate valuations should be conducted by professionals accredited with the Australian Property Institute. Business valuations require specialist accountants or business valuers.

Consider the Time Frame Realistically

When deciding whether to accept a settlement offer, consider how long court proceedings might take and what might happen to property values in that time. A slightly lower settlement now might be preferable to uncertainty over several years.

Address Volatility in Your Agreement

Your agreement can include mechanisms to address value changes. For instance, you might agree to sell a property within a specified timeframe and divide the actual proceeds, rather than basing the settlement on a current valuation that might change.

Document Post-Separation Contributions

If you’re making improvements to properties or maintaining assets after separation, keep detailed records. This evidence will be important if you need to demonstrate your contributions affected the asset’s value.

Seek Strategic Advice

Every situation is different. Obtaining advice early about your specific circumstances helps you make informed decisions about timing, valuation, and negotiation strategy.

Special Considerations for Different Asset Types

Different assets present unique valuation challenges when values change between separation and settlement.

Real Estate

Property valuations can vary significantly depending on the valuer, comparable sales used, and market conditions at the time of assessment. If you and your former partner disagree on property values, mediation can help you agree on a single valuer or a process for reconciling different valuations.

Superannuation

Superannuation balances fluctuate with investment market performance. The value of your super at separation may be quite different from its value at settlement. Under the Family Law (Superannuation) Regulations 2025, specific methods apply for valuing different types of superannuation interests.

Business Interests

Business valuations are particularly susceptible to change based on trading performance, market conditions, and broader economic factors. Expert valuation is essential, and the timing of that valuation can significantly affect the outcome.

Cryptocurrency and Digital Assets

These assets can experience extreme volatility. Clear agreement about the valuation date and methodology is especially important for crypto holdings.

For more information about the factors considered when dividing assets, see our article on what factors are considered when dividing assets in property settlements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I insist that property be valued at the separation date?

Generally, no. Courts almost always use current values at the time of settlement or hearing. The only exceptions relate to unusual circumstances such as wastage, where one party has deliberately diminished an asset’s value, or significant post-separation contributions. Even then, the court typically adjusts the contributions assessment rather than substituting an earlier valuation date.

What if values change dramatically between reaching agreement and finalising orders?

If you’ve reached agreement in principle but haven’t yet obtained consent orders, significant value changes may warrant renegotiation. Once consent orders are made by the court, they’re generally final, regardless of subsequent value changes. This underscores the importance of moving efficiently from agreement to formalised orders.

Who gets the benefit if I’ve been paying the mortgage since separation?

Mortgage payments made after separation are typically treated as post-separation contributions. However, they’re often offset against the benefit you’ve received from occupying the property rent-free (if applicable). The specific treatment depends on your circumstances.

What happens if my former partner won’t engage in mediation?

While family dispute resolution is required before commencing parenting proceedings, there’s no strict requirement for property-only matters. However, attempting genuine resolution before court is expected. If your former partner refuses to engage, document your attempts and seek advice about your options for progressing the matter.

How long do I have to finalise property settlement?

For married couples, you have 12 months from the date your divorce becomes final to apply to the court for property orders. For de facto couples, it’s two years from the date of separation. Missing these deadlines can mean losing your ability to make a claim, so timely action is essential.

Moving Forward with Your Property Settlement

Property value changes between separation and settlement are a reality of Australian family law. While you cannot control market movements, you can control how quickly and efficiently you work towards resolution.

Mediation offers a pathway to resolve property matters faster, more cost-effectively, and with greater certainty than contested court proceedings. By reaching agreement sooner, you reduce your exposure to market volatility and gain certainty about your financial future.

At Mediations Australia, our accredited family dispute resolution practitioners help separating couples navigate property settlements every day. We understand the anxiety that comes with watching property values change while your settlement remains unresolved, and we’re committed to helping you reach fair outcomes efficiently.

If you’re ready to discuss your property settlement options, contact Mediations Australia today to arrange a confidential consultation with an experienced family mediator.

When relationships break down, the path forward can feel overwhelming. For separating couples in Australia, understanding your options is the first step toward a resolution that protects your family’s wellbeing, preserves your financial resources, and minimises emotional trauma.

In 2025, we mark 50 years since the Family Law Act 1975 fundamentally transformed how Australian families navigate separation and divorce. This landmark legislation introduced the concept of “no-fault” divorce, removing the need to prove wrongdoing or assign blame. It was a revolutionary shift—one that recognised that when marriages end, families need support and practical solutions, not courtroom battles.

Yet despite these progressive foundations, many separating couples still find themselves drawn into adversarial legal processes that are costly, emotionally draining, and damaging to the co-parenting relationships they’ll need to maintain for years to come. The good news? There’s a better way forward—and it’s been embedded in Australian family law from the very beginning. It’s family law mediation.

The Vision Behind the Family Law Act: Resolution Over Confrontation

When the Family Law Act came into effect on January 5, 1976, it represented a seismic shift in how Australia approached family breakdown. Prior to this, divorce required proof of matrimonial fault—adultery, cruelty, desertion, or habitual drunkenness. Couples were forced to air private grievances in public forums, often fabricating or exaggerating claims simply to meet legal requirements. The process was humiliating, expensive, and deeply harmful to families.

The 1975 Act introduced a single ground for divorce: irretrievable breakdown of marriage, evidenced by 12 months’ separation. This “no-fault” approach acknowledged a fundamental truth—that assigning blame doesn’t help families move forward. Instead, the legislation’s focus shifted to what truly mattered: the best interests of children, fair property division, and supporting families to rebuild their lives.

Crucially, the Family Law Act also established the Family Court of Australia with a unique mandate: not just to adjudicate disputes, but to help families resolve them. Embedded within the legislation was a clear preference for conciliation and mediation over litigation—a recognition that families achieve better outcomes when they work together to find solutions rather than fighting in court.

Why Mediation Aligns Perfectly with Modern Family Law

The philosophy underpinning the Family Law Act—that families should be supported to resolve disputes constructively—remains as relevant today as it was 50 years ago. In fact, subsequent reforms have only strengthened the emphasis on alternative dispute resolution.

The 2006 amendments to the Family Law Act made family dispute resolution (FDR) a mandatory step before most parenting matters can proceed to court. Separating couples must now attend mediation and make a genuine effort to resolve parenting disputes before filing court applications (except in cases involving family violence or urgent child safety concerns).

This requirement isn’t bureaucratic red tape—it’s a recognition that mediation delivers better outcomes for Australian families. Research consistently shows that parents who reach agreements through mediation are more satisfied with outcomes, comply with arrangements more reliably, and maintain better co-parenting relationships than those who litigate.

Mediation offers separating couples:

Cost-effectiveness: Court proceedings can cost tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees, expert reports, and court costs. Mediation typically costs a fraction of this amount, with many sessions concluding in just a few hours or days rather than months or years of litigation.

Confidentiality: What’s discussed in mediation stays in mediation. Unlike court proceedings, which become public record, mediation protects your family’s privacy and prevents sensitive information from becoming accessible to others.

Control over outcomes: In court, a judge who has spent limited time with your family makes binding decisions. In mediation, you and your former partner craft solutions that reflect your family’s unique circumstances, values, and needs.

Faster resolution: Court backlogs mean parenting and property matters can take 12-18 months or longer to reach final hearing. Mediation can resolve disputes in weeks, allowing your family to move forward and establish stability quickly.

Preservation of relationships: When you have children together, your relationship with your former partner doesn’t end—it transforms into a co-parenting partnership. Mediation focuses on collaboration and communication, skills that serve families long after separation is finalised.

Reduced emotional trauma: Litigation is inherently adversarial. Mediation creates a safe, supportive environment where both parties feel heard and respected, significantly reducing the emotional distress associated with family breakdown.

What Separating Couples Need to Know About Family Mediation

If you’re facing separation, understanding how mediation works within the Australian family law framework can help you make informed decisions about your path forward.

When Is Mediation Appropriate?

Family mediation is suitable for most separating couples dealing with:

• Parenting arrangements: Where children will live, how much time they’ll spend with each parent, how decisions about education and health will be made, and how you’ll communicate as co-parents.
• Property and financial settlements: Division of assets including the family home, superannuation, savings, debts, and other property, as well as spousal maintenance considerations.
• Child support: While child support is typically calculated using the Child Support Agency formula, parents can agree to variations or alternative arrangements through mediation.

Mediation may not be appropriate in situations involving family violence, child abuse, or where significant power imbalances make it impossible for one party to negotiate freely and safely. In these circumstances, legal representation and court protection may be necessary first steps.

The Family Dispute Resolution Process

Family dispute resolution in Australia follows a structured process designed to support constructive dialogue:

1. Initial assessment: You’ll meet individually with an accredited family dispute resolution practitioner (FDRP) who will assess whether mediation is appropriate and safe for your circumstances.
2. Pre-mediation preparation: The FDRP will help you identify the issues to be discussed, gather necessary information (financial documents, children’s schedules, etc.), and prepare for productive conversations.
3. Joint mediation sessions: You, your former partner, and the FDRP meet together (either in person or via video conference). The mediator facilitates discussion, helps you explore options, and guides you toward mutually acceptable solutions. Your mediator remains neutral and doesn’t provide legal advice or make decisions for you.
4. Agreement documentation: If you reach agreement, the FDRP can help document your decisions. For parenting plans, this may be an informal written agreement. For property settlements or parenting orders you want enforceable, you’ll need to formalise agreements through Consent Orders filed with the Federal Circuit and Family Court.
5. Section 60I Certificate: If you attempt mediation in good faith but cannot reach agreement on parenting matters, the FDRP will issue a Section 60I certificate, which allows you to file a court application if necessary.

The Role of Legal Advice in Mediation

While mediation is the preferred pathway for resolving family disputes, independent legal advice plays an important complementary role. Before finalising any agreement—particularly regarding property division—it’s wise to have a family lawyer review the proposed terms and explain your legal rights and obligations.

Legal advice helps ensure that:

• Property settlements are fair and comply with the Family Law Act’s requirements
• Parenting arrangements genuinely reflect children’s best interests
• You understand the long-term implications of any agreement
• Documentation is properly prepared and legally enforceable

Think of legal advice as a safety net—it supports the mediation process by giving you confidence that agreements are legally sound, without taking control away from you or transforming your dispute into an adversarial battle.

The Evolution of Family Law: Continuing to Prioritise Children’s Wellbeing

The past 50 years have seen the Family Law Act evolve through numerous amendments, each reflecting growing understanding of what children need when their parents separate.

The 2006 reforms introduced the concept of “equal shared parental responsibility”—not a presumption of equal time, but rather a requirement that both parents remain involved in major decisions about their children’s lives unless there are safety concerns. This recognised research showing that children generally benefit from meaningful relationships with both parents.

The 2012 amendments further refined the framework, clarifying that children’s safety must take priority over other considerations and that “equal time” is only appropriate when it serves children’s best interests and is reasonably practicable—not a starting point imposed on every family.

Most recently, the Family Law Amendment Act 2023 has strengthened protections for children and families affected by family violence, improved information-sharing between family law and child protection systems, and enhanced case management to resolve disputes more efficiently.

Throughout these changes, one principle has remained constant: families achieve the best outcomes when they can resolve disputes cooperatively, with professional support, rather than through adversarial litigation.

Why Litigation Should Be Your Last Resort

While the family law system provides court processes when they’re genuinely necessary, litigation comes with significant costs that extend far beyond legal fees.

Financial costs: Legal representation for contested family law proceedings commonly costs $30,000-$100,000 or more, depending on complexity. Expert reports (property valuations, family assessments, etc.) add thousands more. Court filing fees, barrister costs for hearings, and ongoing solicitor fees quickly deplete the asset pool that should be supporting your family’s future.

Time costs: From filing an initiating application to final hearing typically takes 12-18 months, often longer in complex cases. During this time, your life remains in limbo—you may be unable to sell property, relocate for employment, or establish stable routines for children.

Emotional costs: The adversarial nature of litigation amplifies conflict. Affidavits detailing your former partner’s failings, cross-examination designed to undermine credibility, and the winner-takes-all dynamic of court hearings inflict psychological harm on everyone involved—especially children, who often feel caught in the middle.

Relationship costs: If you have children together, you’ll be co-parenting for years to come—attending school events, celebrating milestones, navigating adolescence together. Litigation destroys the goodwill and communication that makes effective co-parenting possible.

Uncertainty costs: Even after investing time, money, and emotional energy in litigation, outcomes remain unpredictable. Judicial discretion means you cannot guarantee results, and appeals processes can extend disputes even further.

Taking the First Step: How Mediations Australia Supports Separating Couples

At Mediations Australia, we understand that separation is one of life’s most challenging transitions. Our experienced, accredited family dispute resolution practitioners are committed to helping you navigate this difficult time with dignity, respect, and focus on your family’s future.

We provide:

• A safe, confidential environment for productive conversations
• Neutral facilitation that ensures both voices are heard
• Practical guidance to help you explore creative solutions
• Focus on children’s best interests and your family’s unique needs
• Efficient processes that resolve disputes in weeks, not years
• Significantly lower costs than traditional litigation
• Support for both parenting and property matters

Whether you’re just beginning to consider separation or you’re already navigating complex disputes, mediation offers a pathway forward that protects what matters most: your children’s wellbeing, your financial security, and your ability to move forward constructively.

Conclusion: Honouring 50 Years of Progressive Family Law

The Family Law Act 1975 represented a fundamental shift in how Australia supports families through separation—moving from blame and punishment to understanding and practical assistance. Fifty years later, that progressive vision continues to guide how we approach family breakdown.

Mediation embodies the spirit of the Family Law Act: recognising that when relationships end, families need support to find constructive solutions, not courtroom battles that deepen wounds and drain resources. By choosing mediation first, you’re not only saving time and money—you’re investing in your family’s future, maintaining relationships that matter, and modelling constructive conflict resolution for your children.

If you’re facing separation, you don’t have to navigate this journey alone, and you don’t have to let the process become a battlefield. Mediation offers a better way—one that’s been proven effective for Australian families for five decades.

Take the first step today. Contact Mediations Australia to learn how our family dispute resolution services can help you and your former partner reach fair, practical agreements that allow everyone to move forward with dignity and hope.

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. The Family Law Act 1975 and related legislation contain complex provisions that may apply differently to individual circumstances. Consult a qualified family lawyer or accredited family dispute resolution practitioner for personalised guidance about your specific situation.