Skip to main content
Category

Family Law

property settlements Lawyers Australia

How Property Settlements Work

By Family Law, Mediation, Property Settlement, Property Settlement Dispute

Making a property settlement without the help of a court is possible.

In order to complete a property settlement without the help of the court system, there are a variety of tools accessible to you. You should, however, obtain legal advice from our team of Family Lawyers and Mediators at Mediations Australia to assist you with the preparation of your property settlement agreement due to the complicated nature of such an arrangement.

You will save both time and money if you are able to reach an agreement without having to have the Court intervene.  Additionally, you may be able to better your relationship with your former spouse, which may aid in the resolution of any future issues.

If you and your former spouse have reached an agreement on the terms of a property settlement, you should finalise the arrangement by filing an application with the court for a consent order or entering into a financial agreement.

Book a Free Consultation with a Family Law Expert.

Considering a property settlement? Find out where you stand sooner rather than later.

Agreements on financial matters

In that it specifies how property will be shared between the parties, a financial agreement is comparable to a contract. Those involved in a married or de facto relationship are permitted by the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) to enter into a legally enforceable financial arrangement. It is possible to make a financial agreement either before to or during a relationship. These agreements are commonly referred to as prenuptial agreements.

If you decide to get into a financial arrangement, you must make certain that you fully comprehend the conditions of the agreement. Before entering into any arrangement, each party should get separate legal and financial advice from a qualified professional. If the formal criteria of the agreement are not satisfied, the agreement will be deemed illegitimate, and the court may order its termination. For more legal briefing in property law you can take the help of Strathpine Lawyers.

Orders of consent

It is possible to reach an agreement on a property settlement between you and your ex-partner by creating a formal agreement in the form of a consent order and then requesting permission from a court of competent jurisdiction. Similar to the way a contract works, when you sign the agreement, you are stating that you agree to the conditions laid forth in the document. This is similar to how a lease works. Once the order has been approved by the court, it becomes legally binding.

It is also possible to seek for a consent order without having to appear in court.

Considering a Binding Financial Agreement or Consent Orders?

Let us guide you through what is best suited for your circumstance. Book a free, initial consultation with a family law expert.

Property settlements imposed by the court.

You can file an application with the court to have a court order made on behalf of you and your former partner if you are unable to achieve an agreement outside of court. A court will only issue an order if it is fair and reasonable to modify the property interests of the parties involved in the case.

According to the Family Courts, a four-step method is used to evaluate how much each party is likely to get from the relationship asset pool in the event of a divorce.

In most cases, property settlement talks are done in percentage terms, with the percentages changing as the process goes through the four rounds of the procedure. If you are going through a divorce, this four-step procedure will help you decide what the courts would regard to be a “fair and equitable” allocation of your assets in the case of a divorce.

Consequently, let’s begin with the first step:

Can you tell me about the assets that you have in your asset pool?

Your asset pool, which is made of the following things, acts as the foundation for all property settlement agreements. It is important to understand how your asset pool works.

The value of money, whether it is held in joint names, in your own name, or on behalf of another person, such as a child;

Obligations – once again, your liabilities are included in the asset pool, regardless of whether the liability is held in your name or not; and, once again, your liabilities are included in the asset pool.

As a result of recent legislative changes, the status of non-vested superannuation in the context of a property settlement has altered significantly. Non-vested superannuation is now recognised as “property,” rather than as a retirement benefit.

It is the most basic and reliable technique of calculating your joint asset pool after a divorce is to go through the process of financial disclosure, in which both parties share financial paperwork. It is possible to provide documents in the form of bank statements, tax returns, and appraisals, among other things.

Disclosing information concerning your or your spouse’s property interests, as well as your or your spouse’s individual earnings, financial resources, and trust ties, are all acceptable forms of disclosure.

In accordance with the Family Law Rules of 2004, it is required to give a complete and candid disclosure of all relevant facts (Chapter 13). You or your legal advisor should be able to identify your spouse’s direct and indirect financial conditions as soon as you or your legal counsel gets the disclosure.

Need some information that relates to your circumstance?

Why not book a free appointment now with a family law expert.

How did you get your hands on it in the first place?

Another way of putting it, how did you add to your asset pool during the length of your marriage? A factor that will be taken into consideration by the court is whether you and your spouse have made financial or non-financial contributions to the purchase, improvement, and conservation of your property, as well as the welfare of your family. A property settlement is often viewed in the same manner as a monetary contribution made throughout the course of a relationship, and both financial and non-financial contributions might be given the same amount of respect.

This means that the majority of your financial contributions to your asset pool will come from your income and the way in which it was utilised during the length of the partnership. Your financial contributions, on the other hand, may include gifts or inheritances received during the course of the relationship, as well as cash donations made during the relationship. An enquiry must be carried out in order to ascertain how these monies were spent and whether or not they are still existing in your asset pool at the time of the discovery.

It is equally crucial to make non-financial contributions during the course of the relationship as it is to make money ones. Making contributions in a variety of ways is possible, including providing care for a kid or children, cooking and cleaning, and overseeing financial matters for the home. It is usual for one person to take on these obligations so that the other person may work and contribute financially to the family, despite the fact that non-financial contributions cannot be ascribed a monetary value inside your asset pool. Therefore, in a property settlement, non-financial contributions are accorded the same weight as monetary ones.

What are your hopes and aspirations for the foreseeable future?

A divorce will almost certainly result in one of the parties having more financial requirements in the future than will the other. There are a variety of elements that might impact your future demands, including your health, your age, who is responsible for primary care of a kid or children, and your income, among others. According to Section 75 (2) of the Family Law Act 1975, a full list of the reasons that the court must take into account while evaluating future obligations is set out in detail.

Consider the following two real-life scenarios:

Following the separation, there are two children under the age of twelve who will very certainly remain in the primary custody of their mother following the divorce. This will place the mother in a position of primary caretaker for her children, which may limit her capacity to work and provide a living for herself and her children. This will be taken into consideration by the court as a possible future requirement of the mother.

Book a Free Consultation with a Family Law Expert.

Considering a property settlement? Find out where you stand sooner rather than later.

The husband is a lawyer who works full-time and makes roughly $160,000 per year, while the wife is a nurse who works full-time and earns approximately $70,000 per year. Most likely, the court will come to the decision that the Wife’s income is the most valuable asset she may take from the marriage.

The court’s discretion will ultimately determine whether or not you have a future need and how that need should be met as part of your property settlement.

The allocation of resources is fair, according to question 4.

It is the legal phrase “just and equitable” that is used to characterise the scenario. In practical terms, and following the completion of stages 1 through 3, this means: The allocation of the asset pool, which includes obligations and superannuation, is equal in all respects. Is the asset pool distributed in an equal manner, to put it differently?

When it comes to divorce and child custody, what you or your spouse deems “fair” is not often what the court considers “just and equitable.” Many people believe that dividing your asset pool 50/50 is a fair distribution of your money. This is a frequent misconception. If you are getting married or entering into a civil partnership, the court has a responsibility to guarantee that the financial and non-financial contributions made by both parties are taken into consideration, as well as their future requirements in the framework of your marriage or civil partnership. Due to the fact that the court will take all of these elements into consideration in the context of your specific relationship, the court will make any necessary modifications, resulting in divisions such as 55/45 or 60/40, for example.

Although the 4-step procedure is rather straightforward, as is true of most things in family law, it is not without its flaws, and your final conclusion will be decided by the individual circumstances of your partnership. It is vital that you receive independent legal counsel as soon as possible after your divorce has been finalised in order to prevent being misled during the property settlement talks. When clients come to our office a few months or even years after their divorce, they often bring in what we call a “dogs breakfast,” which they have constructed because they did not obtain even the most basic legal guidance while they were still married to one other, we are sometimes surprised.

Before engaging in any property settlement talks, it is advised that you have at the very least a basic grasp of your claim after going through the 4-step procedure with your legal counsel. Following that, your legal adviser should be able to give you with choices for completing your property settlement in the most expedient and cost-effective manner possible.

What Should You Do Now?

At Mediations Australia, we have a team of family lawyers and mediators who can assist you in Sydney, Perth, Adelaide, Melbourne and all other locations in Australia. We also do international family law matters.

Getting legal advice early is the most important thing to do.

Sadly people often wait too long to get legal advice. Take advantage of our FREE consultation with a family law expert.
separation & Divorce Lawyers Brisbane, Adelaide, Canberra & Gold Coast

What am I entitled to in a Separation?

By Family Law

What am I entitled to in a separation?

The most important questions you need to answer when you are separating from your partner are;

  • what am I entitled to in a separation;
  • how the assets will divide;
  • what is the percentage of division?

In Australia when a couple separates, there can be a misunderstanding of entitlements when it comes to liabilities and assets including loans, bitcoins, mortgages, and shares. The most prevalent misunderstandings are that assets that are not owned jointly will not be part of the asset pool for division and that all assets will be divided equally.

So, if you are recently divorced or separated and want to know the answer to these questions continue reading. In this article, we are going to discuss the concerns related to a settlement when a couple are separating. We will also who is entitled to what, how the assets are settled and how you can potentially obtain more from a property settlement.

According to law, what am I entitled to in a separation in Australia?

A defined or fixed formula is not used for the determination of assets and liabilities division. The settlement and division vary from case to case and it is not fixed. It is done according to the individual facts of each family law matter and an unbiassed division is performed based on unique circumstances and references. Also, there is no predefined determination about how much property pool you will be given by the court. There is no such thing as a 50/50 automatic split.

To find out more about your question, “what am I entitled to in a separation in Australia” read these five steps taken by the family court when considering your property settlement. The family law courts in Australia apply this 5 step approach when assessing what you are entitled to in divorce settlement or de facto separation.

Thinking about separation or divorce?

Why not take the guess work out of it. Book a free consultation with a family law expert.

#1. What defines the property pool

The court will define the property pool by collecting the list of properties and liabilities. A property pool is a collection of all the assets, properties, liabilities whether owned jointly or solely by both partners. For instance, assets include houses, blocks of land, investments, bitcoin, bank accounts, businesses, any vehicle or conveyance, and shares. And liabilities include all types of loans, bank ATM cards, etc. If a partner sells an asset from the pool, it will add back into the property pool as long as such asset can be adequately traced. That is why it is better to get the property settlement done near the time of separation to minimize the risk of assets going missing.

#2. Find out the contribution of each partner in the property pool

After the determination of the property pool, the court finds out the financial contributions of both partners to the property pool. The contributions that both the parties made to the purchase and maintenance of the property. The contributions are of three types; assets owned by both partners before the relationship and the property, liabilities bought during the relationship, and the contributions from both partners after the relationship that is each party has paid since the separation date including loan repayments, credit payments, etc. This does not mean that if one party to the relationship has not been a breadwinner they will get less.

#3. Analyze whether the property settlement should be made or not?

The court then proceeds to find whether it is equitable to divide the property. There may be cases, albeit limited, where there is no need to divide the property pool.

Considering a Property Settlement?

Find out where you stand. Book a free initial consultation with a family law expert.

#4. Determine whether it is important to issue orders for future needs?

Then comes the next step in which the court gauges the need for future adjustment for one or both parties. The adjustment for future needs includes the income of both parties, age, earning capacity, health, and brought up of child/children. If the court assesses that the health, age, and earnings are the same for both partners and they are at the same level, the adjustment orders for future needs are not issued.

#5. Measure the practicality of proposed property settlement

The last step is to measure the practical nature of the proposed property settlement. The court decides whether it is fair and just for that specific property settlement to occur. Moreover, a divorce lawyer can assist you in answering your question, “what am I entitled to in a separation in Australia “better than this article can. Every case is unique.

How to perform an equitable calculation for property settlement?

Here are some steps you can take in preparing your family lawyer for an initial consultation.

  • List all the assets and liabilities
  • Determine the contributions of both parties
  • The length of the relationship
  • Subtract the liabilities to determine the total property pool
  • Determine the future needs of you and your former partner

Based on these steps you can obtain a rough percentage of a property settlement.

Time and requirements for the application of settlement

According to the Family Law Act in Australia, the property settlement approach in both marriage and de facto relationship is quite similar. Though there are some significant differences such as a time limit for the application process. The time to make an application for a property settlement is 1 year in the case of marriage separation. Once the divorce agreement is finalised, you need to submit your application for a property settlement within a year after the divorce.

On the other hand, you have a time limit of 2 years if you were in a de facto relationship. After the end of the relationship, you can apply for the settlement within two years. Moreover, in the case of a de facto relationship, the court proceeds on the property settlement if you satisfy the court with one of the following:

  1. Your relationship span was two or more years.
  2.  You gave birth to your partner’s child during the relationship.
  3. You put significant contributions and support your partner through thick and thin, but the relationship failed due to the conduct of your partner or he/she cheating on you.
  4. A legal record of your relationship is available or it was registered under the law of the state.

Need some information that relates to your circumstance?

Why not book a free appointment now with a family law expert.

What is the rule of asset division or property settlement?

As stated previously, there is a very common misconception among people that the property and liabilities are divided among both parties by the so-called mythical 50-50 rule. In other words, the property pool is divided into two halves and both parties separate with 50% each of the pool. The court itself decides the property settlement after assessing all relevant factors, following which the court issues an order that finalizes the settlement.

The most important thing you can do prior to or following separation regardless of whether you were married or in a de facto relationship is to seek legal advice.

FAQs(frequently asked questions )

What are my entitlements when separating in Australia?

Separating from a partner can be a challenging time, and figuring out what you’re entitled to financially can add to the stress. In Australia, the process of dividing assets and liabilities during separation is called property settlement. This ensures a fair and just outcome for both parties, considering each person’s contributions to the relationship.

What’s included in the property pool:

Imagine all the financial assets and debts you and your partner have accumulated throughout your relationship – that’s essentially the property pool. This includes things you might readily think of, like:

  • Real estate (house, land)
  • Investments (stocks, bonds)
  • Superannuation (retirement savings)
  • Businesses (sole proprietorships, partnerships)
  • Vehicles (cars, motorcycles)

It also includes valuable personal possessions, like jewelry or artwork. Don’t forget to factor in debts or liabilities, such as mortgages, car loans, or credit card debt.

How are assets and debts divided:

The Family Law Act 1975 sets out the guidelines for dividing the property pool. The court doesn’t simply split everything 50/50. Instead, they consider various factors to determine what a “just and equitable” division looks like for your unique situation. Here’s what they might take into account:

  • Financial contributions: This includes both direct financial contributions, like who paid for what during the relationship, and indirect contributions. Did one partner stay home to raise children while the other focused on their career? Did someone contribute their skills or labor to renovate the house, increasing its value? These all count.
  • Future needs: The court might consider how your future financial situation might look after separation. Factors like age, health, ability to earn income, and who will be caring for children can all play a role.
  • Length of the relationship: Generally, the longer you were together, the more weight is given to contributions made during that time.

There’s no one-size-fits-all approach:

Unlike some countries, Australia doesn’t have a set formula for dividing assets. Each case is decided on its own merits. This allows the court to consider the specific circumstances of your relationship and ensure a truly fair outcome.

Getting help with property settlement:

Property settlement can be a complex process, especially if you have significant assets or have difficulty reaching an agreement with your former partner. Here’s where seeking legal advice can be invaluable. An experienced family lawyer can:

  • Explain your rights and entitlements under the law.
  • Help you gather and value all your assets and liabilities.
  • Negotiate a fair settlement with your ex-partner’s lawyer.
  • Represent you in court if necessary.

Many community legal centers also offer free or low-cost legal advice on family law matters, including property settlement. Don’t hesitate to reach out for professional guidance during this time.

By understanding the principles of property settlement and seeking legal advice if needed, you can navigate this process with more clarity and confidence, ensuring you receive a fair and just outcome.

Does a husband have to support his wife during separation in Australia?

Australia’s Family Law Act 1975 permits for the possibility of spousal maintenance after separation, meaning a husband may be ordered to financially support his former partner depending on the unique circumstances of their case.

Spousal maintenance orders issued by a court require one party to make regular payments to cover reasonable living expenses of their ex-spouse, when there is a significant disparity in income or resources between both of them. Such orders usually become effective following separation.

Several factors are taken into consideration when determining whether spousal maintenance should be awarded and, if so, the appropriate amount and duration. These factors include:

  1. Income and Earning Capacity:
  • Current Income: This includes salaries, wages, income from investments, and any government benefits received.
  • Future Earning Potential: The court doesn’t just look at the present. They consider age, qualifications, work experience, and future job prospects. For example, a younger spouse with a professional degree might have a higher earning potential than an older spouse with limited work experience, even if their current incomes are similar.
  • Impact of Separation on Earning: Did one spouse give up career opportunities to support the other during the marriage? For example, a wife who stayed home to raise children might have a lower earning capacity after separation compared to a husband who focused on his career advancement. 
  1. Financial Resources:
  • Assets: The court will evaluate the value of all assets owned by each spouse, including real estate, vehicles, investments, and superannuation (retirement savings). 
  • Debts and Liabilities: Don’t forget about debts! The court will consider outstanding mortgages, car loans, credit card debt, and other financial obligations. These can affect a person’s ability to pay or receive spousal maintenance.
  • Inheritances or Gifts: Any recent inheritances or gifts received by either party might also be considered as part of their overall financial resources.
  1. Reasonable Living Expenses:
  • Standard of Living During Marriage: This includes housing costs, transportation, food, clothing, entertainment, and any other expenses considered essential to maintain a reasonable standard of living.
  • Special Needs: These additional costs will be factored into the equation to ensure both parties can maintain a basic but comfortable lifestyle after separation.
  • Location and Cost of Living: The cost of living can vary significantly across different regions in Australia. The court will consider the location where each spouse resides when determining reasonable living expenses.
  1. Age and Health:
  • Age: A younger spouse might have more time to retrain, re-enter the workforce, and achieve financial self-sufficiency compared to an older spouse nearing retirement.
  • Health: A chronic health condition or disability can significantly impact a person’s ability to work full-time or secure employment with a high income.
  1. Caregiving Responsibilities:
  • Primary Caregiver: If one spouse is the primary caregiver for children or other dependents, their ability to earn an income might be limited. Spousal maintenance can help compensate for the financial strain associated with childcare costs and maintaining a household while managing these responsibilities.
  • Impact on Future Earning: The court might consider the long-term impact of caregiving responsibilities on a spouse’s future earning potential.

Note that spousal maintenance orders are not permanent and should be reviewed periodically or when circumstances significantly alter, usually once every few years or whenever circumstances require such review. The court strives to foster financial independence and self-sufficiency over time for both parties involved in an order.

If you are seeking spousal maintenance or are uncertain of your obligations, consulting with a family lawyer or legal aid service would be highly advisable. They can assess your specific situation and recommend the most effective strategy to protect your rights and interests during the separation process.

Who pays bills during separation in Australia?

During a separation in Australia, both parties are generally expected to contribute to the ongoing household and personal expenses based on their financial capabilities and any agreements reached between them. However, the specific arrangements for paying bills can vary depending on the circumstances of each case.

Here are some common scenarios and considerations regarding bill payments during separation:

  • Shared residence: If both parties continue to reside in the same property during the separation, they may agree to share the household expenses, such as mortgage or rent payments, utilities, groceries, and other shared costs. This arrangement can help maintain stability and ensure that essential bills are paid while the separation process unfolds.
  • Separate residences: If one party moves out during the separation, they may be responsible for their personal living expenses, including rent, utilities, and other costs associated with their new residence. The other party may continue paying the bills for the shared residence, or they may agree to split certain expenses based on their respective financial situations.
  • Child-related expenses: If there are children involved, the court may issue orders or the parties may agree on arrangements for sharing expenses related to the children’s care, such as childcare costs, education fees, medical expenses, and extracurricular activities.
  • Interim spousal maintenance: In some cases, where there is a significant disparity in income or financial resources, the court may order one party to pay interim spousal maintenance to the other during the separation period. This can help cover living expenses and bills for the lower-earning or financially dependent party.
  • Agreements and consent orders: Separating couples can also choose to formalize their arrangements for bill payments through legally binding financial agreements or consent orders. These documents outline the specific responsibilities and obligations of each party regarding expenses and can be enforced by the court if necessary.

Note that when making decisions regarding financial arrangements during divorce and separation, courts prioritize meeting reasonable living expenses for both parties involved and any children that may be present. They may take contributions and future needs into consideration when making decisions related to bill payments and other financial obligations.

If you ever find yourself confused regarding bill payment during separation, seeking legal advice from either a family lawyer or community legal center could prove useful in providing tailored guidance based on your unique circumstances to assist in managing this process more smoothly.

Who pays for a divorce in Australia?

In Australia, the party initiating the divorce proceedings is generally responsible for paying the associated costs, including court fees and legal expenses. However, there are various factors that can influence who ultimately bears the financial burden of a divorce.

  • Court fees: The party applying for the divorce (the applicant) is required to pay the court filing fee, which is currently $940 for a divorce application without any other accompanying applications (as of 2023). This fee must be paid when submitting the divorce application to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
  • Legal fees: If the parties choose to engage legal representation, they will be responsible for paying their respective lawyers’ fees. Legal fees can vary significantly depending on the complexity of the case, the experience of the lawyer, and the amount of work required. Some lawyers may offer fixed-fee packages or unbundled services to help manage costs.
  • Shared costs: In certain circumstances, the court may order that the costs of the divorce proceedings be shared between the parties. This can occur when there are contentious issues or disputes that increase the complexity and duration of the case, resulting in higher legal expenses for both parties.
  • Property settlement orders: In some cases, the court may include provisions for the payment of divorce costs as part of the overall property settlement orders. This can involve one party being required to contribute to or reimburse the other party’s legal expenses related to the divorce proceedings.
  • Legal aid and pro bono services: For individuals with limited financial means, there may be opportunities to access legal aid or pro bono (free) legal services. These services can help mitigate the costs associated with a divorce, although eligibility criteria and availability may vary based on location and individual circumstances.

It’s important to note that the costs of a divorce are separate from any property settlement or spousal maintenance proceedings that may occur as part of the separation process. These additional legal proceedings can incur further expenses, which are typically borne by each party individually or allocated based on court orders or mutual agreements.

If you are considering divorce and have concerns about the associated costs, it’s advisable to consult with a family lawyer or legal aid service. They can provide guidance on managing expenses, exploring cost-effective options, and ensuring that your rights and interests are protected throughout the process.

Who gets to stay in the house during separation in Australia?

In Australia, when a couple separates, the decision of who gets to stay in the family home during the separation period can be a complex and sensitive issue. The court’s primary concern is to ensure the best interests of any children involved and maintain a stable living environment for them. Several factors are considered when determining the living arrangements during separation.

  • Children’s best interests: If there are children involved, the court will prioritize their well-being and aim to minimize disruptions to their living situation. The parent who has primary caregiving responsibilities or the one who can provide a more stable and consistent environment for the children may be granted temporary occupancy of the family home.
  • Financial contributions: The court will consider the financial contributions made by each party towards acquiring and maintaining the family home. The party who has made significant financial contributions or has a greater ownership stake in the property may have a stronger claim to remain in the residence during the separation.
  • Domestic violence considerations: If there are allegations or evidence of domestic violence or abuse within the relationship, the court may grant exclusive occupancy of the family home to the victim and restrict the perpetrator’s access. This is done to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the affected party and any children involved.
  • Interim orders: The court can issue interim or temporary orders regarding the living arrangements during the separation period. These orders are intended to maintain the status quo and provide stability while the parties work towards a final property settlement or parenting arrangements.
  • Mutual agreements: In some cases, separating couples may reach a mutual agreement regarding who will remain in the family home during the separation period. These agreements can be formalized through consent orders or legally binding financial agreements, which can then be enforced by the court if necessary.
  • Alternative arrangements: If neither party can remain in the family home due to financial constraints or other reasons, the court may consider alternative living arrangements, such as one party residing with family or friends, or both parties finding separate rental accommodations until a final property settlement is reached.

Note that decisions regarding living arrangements during separation should not be seen as definitive and could change as circumstances evolve or parties move closer towards reaching an ultimate property settlement agreement.

If the living arrangements of your separation are contentious or unclear, it would be wise to consult a family lawyer or community legal center for legal advice. They can advise on your rights and options while advocating on your behalf for optimal outcome while prioritizing any children involved.

Ultimately, the court strives to ensure that separating couples and their children have access to stable living arrangements during their separation period that meet both individual circumstances and contributions of each case.

What Should You Do Now?

At Mediations Australia, we have a team of family lawyers and mediators who can assist you in Canberra, Perth, Adelaide, Melbourne and all other locations in Australia. We also do international family law matters.

Getting legal advice early is the most important thing to do.

Sadly people often wait too long to get legal advice. Take advantage of our FREE consultation with a family law expert.
cost of divorce in Australia - Mediation Australia

The Cost of Divorce in Australia

By Alternate Dispute Resolution, Family Law, Family Law Disputes, Mediation

Listen to this article instead

Play

The Cost of Divorce in Australia

The Cost of Divorce in Australia doesn’t have to be as high as you may think. It’s likely that you have heard of the horror stories of family lawyers who have charged so much that there wasn’t much left after they took out their fees. While those stories are sometimes true, the cost of divorce in Australia doesn’t necessarily have to be expensive.

But first things first. Are you looking for information about the actual cost to file a divorce application as opposed to the cost to resolve a family law dispute?

If you are looking for information relating to the former, at Mediations Australia, our Sydney, Adelaide, Melbourne, Canberra, Perth, family lawyers can assist you in filing that application for divorce. For more information in that regard, we recommend you click this link.

Thinking about separation or divorce?

Why not take the guess work out of it. Book a free consultation with a family law expert.

Initial Divorce Application Costs

The basic cost of filing for divorce in Australia starts with the application fee. As of 2024, the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia charges:

  • Standard application fee: $1,020
  • Reduced application fee: $350 (for eligible concession card holders)
  • Joint application fee: Same costs apply
  • Second application fee: Full fee applies

Application for Divorce Process

The divorce application process involves several steps:

  1. Complete the application form
  2. File required documentation
  3. Serve documents on your spouse (if sole application)
  4. Attend hearing (if required)
  5. Receive divorce order

Understanding Total Divorce Costs

The total cost of divorce in Australia typically includes:

  • Court filing fees
  • Legal representation costs
  • Mediation expenses
  • Property settlement fees
  • Document preparation charges

Factors Affecting Overall Costs:

  • Complexity of your situation
  • Level of agreement between parties
  • Choice of dispute resolution method
  • Legal representation requirements
  • State/territory variations

Cost of Divorce by State/Territory

Cost of Divorce in NSW

  • Average lawyer fees: $400-$700 per hour
  • Traditional litigation costs: Up to $200,000
  • Mediation through Mediations Australia: Under $4,000
  • Court filing fees: Standard federal court costs
  • Property settlement: Based on asset pool

In NSW, while traditional legal fees can escalate quickly, our Sydney office provides cost-effective mediation solutions that have helped hundreds of couples reach amicable agreements.

Cost of Divorce in Queensland

  • Lawyer hourly rates: $350-$650
  • Court litigation timeframe: 2-3 years average
  • Mediation costs: $3,000 (shared between parties)
  • Fast resolution timeframe: Often within days
  • Property settlement: Asset-dependent

Our Brisbane mediators have achieved a 90% success rate in resolving Queensland divorce matters within days rather than years.

Cost of Divorce in SA

  • Traditional legal fees: Up to $175,000 per party
  • Mediation solution: Under $4,000 total
  • Court filing fees: Standard federal costs
  • Average resolution time: 2-4 weeks with mediation
  • Settlement costs: Varies by complexity

Our Adelaide team specializes in rapid, cost-effective resolutions that save South Australian couples significant legal fees.

Cost of Divorce in ACT

  • Average lawyer costs: $350-$600 per hour
  • Full litigation costs: $150,000+ per party
  • Mediation total cost: $3,000 plus GST
  • Property settlement: Asset pool dependent
  • Document preparation: Included in mediation fee

From our Canberra office, we’ve helped numerous ACT couples avoid costly court battles through our structured mediation process.

Cost of Divorce in NT

  • Traditional legal pathway: $200,000+ total
  • Mediation alternative: Under $4,000
  • Court filing fees: Standard federal rates
  • Resolution timeframe: Days vs years
  • Settlement services: Comprehensive support

Our Darwin mediators provide Northern Territory residents with significant cost savings through our proven mediation process.

Cost-Saving Alternatives

Mediation Benefits

  • Average cost: $3,000
  • Faster resolution
  • Less confrontational
  • Higher success rates
  • Legally binding outcomes

Arbitration Advantages

  • More structured than mediation
  • Less expensive than court
  • Faster than litigation
  • Confidential process
  • Binding decisions

Hidden Costs to Consider

Emotional Costs

  • Personal stress
  • Family impact
  • Work disruption
  • Relationship strain
  • Future implications

Financial Impacts

  • Asset division costs
  • Property valuation fees
  • Superannuation splitting
  • Tax implications
  • Future financial planning

Professional Recommendations

To minimize divorce costs:

  1. Consider mediation first
  2. Maintain open communication
  3. Gather documentation early
  4. Be prepared for negotiations
  5. Consider cost-benefit of decisions

Tips for Cost Management

  • Choose the right dispute resolution method
  • Be organized with documentation
  • Communicate clearly with legal team
  • Consider unbundled legal services
  • Use mediation where possible

The Cost to Resolve Your Family Law Dispute

If you’re still here, then you’re wanting to more broadly understand what it actually costs to resolve your family law dispute.  In this context, you may have separated and had disagreements with your former partner about a property settlement, parenting matters, child support, spousal maintenance, and possibly other issues.

In assessing the costs of divorce in this context, there are many factors you need to consider. At the outset, the first of which is that family lawyers aren’t cheap. The average cost per hour for a family lawyer in Australia is approximately $400 and this can climb to $700, depending upon the experience and expertise of the relevant lawyer. It’s not hard to see that if your family law matter is complex or you or your former partner are not willing to resolve it without going to court (litigation), then it’s not hard to see that the collective family law fees may be hundreds of thousands of dollars. Remember, the average time it takes to get a family law matter to Court in Australia is approximately 3.5 years. That’s a lot of legal fees.

That said, the cost of divorce in Australia doesn’t have to be expensive. You and your former partner can significantly reduce your legal fees by isolating the real issues causing the dispute and each of you has a willingness or preparedness to resolve the dispute through mediation.

The Importance of Looking at the Alternatives

Mediation is a mandatory step in all family law matters and to best reduce the cost of divorce is to resolve the issue at this juncture. The cost of mediation is approximately $3,000. It’s not hard to see why you and your former partner should be considering mediation over litigation.

That said, there are of course other alternatives to mediation. For example, if your family law dispute is complex, but you still want to have lawyers engaged in the process, arbitration may be a useful alternative.  In this case, like a court, your lawyers prepare the documents and present their case to an arbitrator, who acts as a family law judge. The arbitrator makes his or her decision, and their findings are legally-binding.

Need some information that relates to your circumstance?

Why not book a free appointment now with a family law expert.

Arbitration as a Litigation Alternative

Arbitration is a dispute resolution process that is conducted by a third party who does not have any connection to the parties involved in the dispute.

The arbitration process has been around for centuries and it has been used in many different contexts. It was initially used to settle disputes between merchants and traders, but today it is regularly used to resolve family law disputes.

Arbitration is often more cost-effective than litigation because there are no court costs and the arbitrator sets their own fee. At Mediations Australia, you can book a free, initial consultation to learn more about our arbitration fees.

The advantages of arbitration are that it is often less expensive than litigation; it can be completed more quickly; and it does not require public proceedings, which means that confidentiality can be maintained.

However, some disadvantages are that there are no appeals courts for arbitration decisions; there may not be as many procedural protections for the parties involved, and there may not be as much opportunity for discovery or questioning witnesses.

That said, in the context of minimising the costs of divorce, it is an excellent choice and is significantly cheaper than litigation.

Book a Free Consultation with a Family Law Expert.

Considering a property settlement? Find out where you stand sooner rather than later.

The Other Hidden Costs of Litigation

Family law disputes handled through litigation is a contact sport. In other words, it’s a brutal, demanding, fatiguing way to resolve a dispute about parenting, property or another issue. The impact of a family relationship breakdown has a massive impact on all involved, let alone considering the weight that litigation has on those strained relationships.

At Mediations Australia, we highly recommend that you consider your dispute primarily through this lens and get in and out of your dispute as quickly as possible.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Everything Split 50/50 in a Divorce Australia?

No, property division in Australian divorces isn’t automatically 50/50. The Family Law Act requires a ‘just and equitable’ division based on several factors:

  • Length of relationship
  • Financial contributions
  • Non-financial contributions (like homemaking and childcare)
  • Future needs and earning capacity
  • Care of children

At Mediations Australia, we help couples reach fair agreements considering these factors, often achieving resolution without costly court intervention.

Who Pays for Divorce in Australia?

The costs associated with divorce include:

  • Application fee ($1,020 or $350 with concession)
  • Legal fees if required
  • Mediation costs (approximately $3,000 total)

For joint applications, couples often share the court filing fee. At Mediations Australia, our mediation fees are typically split between parties and included in the property pool calculations, making it a cost-effective solution compared to traditional litigation which can cost $200,000+ per party.

What is My Wife Entitled to in a Divorce in Australia?

Entitlements aren’t gender-specific in Australian family law. Both parties have rights to:

  • Fair share of matrimonial assets
  • Superannuation splitting
  • Ongoing child support if applicable
  • Potential spousal maintenance

Through our mediation process, we help couples reach agreements that consider:

  • Individual contributions to the relationship
  • Future needs and circumstances
  • Parenting arrangements
  • Financial capacity
  • Health and age factors

Do I Have to Support My Wife After Divorce in Australia?

Spousal maintenance isn’t automatic but may be required if:

  • One party can’t adequately support themselves
  • The other party has the capacity to provide support
  • It’s reasonable given the circumstances

Our mediators help couples negotiate fair maintenance arrangements, considering:

  • Income earning capacity
  • Reasonable financial needs
  • Effect of relationship on earning capacity
  • Care of children
  • Standard of living

Who Loses the Most in a Divorce?

From our extensive experience in family law mediation, the biggest losses often come from:

  • Prolonged legal battles
  • Emotional strain
  • Damaged relationships
  • Excessive legal fees
  • Time lost to litigation

This is why we advocate for mediation, which:

  • Costs under $4,000 total
  • Resolves matters in days, not years
  • Preserves relationships
  • Reduces emotional stress
  • Achieves 90% success rate

How Long Does Divorce Take in Australia?

The timeline varies:

  • Divorce application: 4 months minimum after filing
  • Property settlement: No set timeline, but best resolved quickly

Through Mediations Australia’s services:

  • Mediation can be arranged within weeks
  • Most matters resolve in 1-2 sessions
  • Property settlements often complete within months
  • Significant time savings versus litigation (which averages 3 years)

What Should You Do Now?

The best way forward in all family law matters is to seek professional advice. Unfortunately, many people in this predicament can delay getting such advice which may worsen the dispute. At Mediations Australia, we offer a free, initial consultation on all matters relating to the cost of divorce in Australia.  Talk to one of our Sunshine Coast Mediation team today.

Getting legal advice early is the most important thing to do.

Sadly people often wait too long to get legal advice. Take advantage of our FREE consultation with a family law expert.
What’s the Difference Between a De Facto Relationship and Marriage?

What’s the Difference Between a De Facto Relationship and Marriage?

By Alternate Dispute Resolution, Family Law, Family Law Disputes

The De facto Relationship: Changing Face of Australian Families

Australian society has undergone significant change in many ways in recent decades.

Not only do we look a lot more diverse than we once did, but our definition of what constitutes a family is also very different to what we once understood by that term.

That change includes the rise of de facto relationships in preference to marriage. According to the latest Census, one in six Australians aged 15 or over now lives in a de facto relationship.

The significance of this change has been incrementally reflected in the law. But for some relatively minor differences, the rights and obligations of people in de facto relationships – whether man and woman or same-sex – are nowadays all but the same as married couples.

Thinking about separation or divorce?

Why not take the guess work out of it. Book a free consultation with a family law expert.

How are de facto couples recognised by law

A de facto relationship is defined under section 44A of the Family Law Act 1975 as a relationship between two people, including same-sex people, who are not otherwise legally married or related by family and with regard to all the circumstances of their relationship, live together on a ‘genuine’ domestic basis.

This definition, however, is not applied uniformly across government bureaucracy or even in different pieces of government legislation.

Courts employ a four-point threshold test to evaluate a relationship as de facto:

  • That the parties have been in the relationship for at least 2 years;
  • that there is a child from the relationship;
  • that the relationship is, or was, registered under a prescribed law of a State or Territory;
  • that in assessing property or custodial claims resulting from a breakdown of the relationship, it is recognised that significant contributions were made by one party and the failure to issue an order would result in serious injustice.

Once a de facto relationship is recognised, the rights of parties closely resemble those of married couples. If one partner dies, for example, the other can:

  • Be entitled to a share of his or her estate;
  • receive funds under workers’ compensation, if the partner died at work;
  • access the partner’s superannuation;
  • claim social security.

Need some information that relates to your circumstance?

Why not book a free appointment now with a family law expert.

How courts approach de facto relationships

Like married couples, the need for the court to intervene to decide disputes in relation to children and/or financial settlements also exists when a de facto relationship ends.

While married people can show a marriage certificate as proof of their relationship, de facto relationships can be more difficult to establish. Commonly, a party to the relationship with more substantial financial resources will deny the relationship qualified as a de facto one in order to avoid any split of assets when the relationship ends.

In addition to the threshold factors listed above, the court will assess the relationship on the basis of a number of different factors, not all of which need to be present for the relationship to exist.

It should be noted that a de facto relationship can be established even when one party is legally married to someone else, or also in a de facto relationship with another person.

Other factors the court will take into account include:

  • Whether a sexual relationship existed between the parties;
  • the extent and nature of shared living arrangements;
  • the parties’ financial dependence on each other;
  • the mutual commitment of the couple to a shared life;
  • whether the relationship was recognised by others, such as family and friends, as de facto, and the couple presented themselves in that way;
  • ownership, use and acquisition of the parties’ property.

Evidence may be required to prove or disprove any of the factors listed.

Alternative dispute resolution

As it is for married couples, the Family Law Act mandates mediation, or alternative dispute resolution, before making an application to the court for orders.

Mediation offers a cheaper, faster and generally less stressful means for couples to resolve areas of disagreement and dispute between them.

An accredited mediator facilitates this session, where both parties are able to put their case before a process of negotiations takes place to narrow discord with the aim of finding a workable solution both parties can abide by.

Any agreement reached between the parties can then be presented to the court for consent orders to formalise its terms.

Book a Free Consultation with a Family Law Expert.

Considering a property settlement? Find out where you stand sooner rather than later.

Are there any other differences between marriage and de facto?

The other key differences between marriage and de facto relationships apply to the end of the union.

Those seeking a divorce in Australia must meet certain conditions, including that they are Australian citizens; have lived in Australia for the past 12 months and intend to continue living in Australia; have been separated for at least 12 months, and; if married for under two years, the parties need to have filed a counselling certificate after attending counselling.

Divorcees must then begin property or spousal maintenance proceedings within 12 months of becoming divorced unless an extension is granted.

By contrast, de facto couples do not need to do anything when the relationship ends. If one or both parties wish to go to court to get a property settlement, however, proceedings must be commenced within two years of the relationship ending.

Conclusion

While de facto relationships are treated similarly to marriage, some differences remain in how such a relationship is defined. Centrelink, for instance, consider a couple to be in a de facto relationship from the moment they start living together, while Australia’s migration law insists parties have been living together for a period of 12 months or longer.

Whether you’re married or in a de facto relationship, the expertise of family law legal professionals can be invaluable in helping you assess your options when a relationship breaks down.

If you would like to further discuss any of the issues raised in this article, contact our expert Sydney, Melbourne, Perth, Brisbane, Sunshine Coast Mediation team today. Mediations Australia exists to help people stay out of court and resolve their issues in a faster, cheaper and more effective way.

Getting legal advice early is the most important thing to do.

Sadly people often wait too long to get legal advice. Take advantage of our FREE consultation with a family law expert.
is mediation compulsory - Mediation Australia

Is Family Law Mediation Compulsory?

By Family Law, Family Law Disputes

Under Australia’s Family Law Act 1975, separated families must first undertake family dispute mediation before approaching the court for orders about parenting.

This requirement both helps the Family Court manage its workload and provides a more affordable, more accessible way for parties to a dispute about how their children will be raised come to an agreement of their own making.

Through mediation – also sometimes referred to as ‘alternative dispute resolution’ – an ex-couple can be assisted by a neutral third party who will help them discuss the areas on which they agree and those where they disagree to help find a middle ground as the basis for an agreement.

Below is more detail on how this process works but if you have any questions or concerns about family dispute resolution, contact us for detailed information today.

Thinking about separation or divorce?

Why not take the guess work out of it. Book a free consultation with a family law expert.

How does a mediation session work?

In many cases couples with children who separate are able to come to their own agreement on the living arrangements for the children, including issues about education, health, holidays and the myriad other issues a family must address.

An informal agreement between former partners can be given effect by being brought before the court and formalised as ‘consent orders’, with both parties then obliged to honour the terms of the agreement.

Where the above issues can’t be resolved between the parents, a family law mediator can be engaged. This person generally has specialist training and accreditation to perform the role. Acting as an independent third party, the mediator is there to facilitate discussion and negotiation, rather than lead or direct. If there is a history of family violence between the parties or a threat thereof, the practitioner is trained to handle this circumstance.

In most cases, both parties will meet at a neutral location, such as the mediator’s conference room or another mutually convenient venue, at a set time. The mediator will make an introduction and explain how the discussion will work, with both parties able to make their case detailing their wishes for the children.

The parties will then often split into separate rooms and employ what’s known as ‘shuttle mediation’ as the mediator goes back and forth between the parties to help refine the areas where compromise is possible.

While its possible for each party to have a legal representative with them, unlike in court lawyers are expected to provide support and advice at the appropriate time, rather than try and run the mediation process.

Ultimately, the aim is to achieve an agreement both parents can live with as a parenting plan. If agreed on, the mediator can create the plan in writing and have it dated and signed by both parents.

Any parenting plan should include detail on how it can be changed in the future and how disagreements can be resolved. Most people allow for the fact the plan will be subject to change as children grow older and become more independent.

Involved in a Parenting Dispute?

Talk to one of our early-resolution focused family law experts. Book a Free Consultation Now.

Children’s participation in the mediation process

Depending on their age, children may be included in the mediation process. In most cases, a special family consultant with experience interviewing children – who may or may not be the appointed mediator – is engaged to conduct interviews with children and then provide details of what they said back to the parents before their mediation.

The older a child is, the more likely their views will be taken into account in formation of a parenting plan or, later, by the court if the dispute cannot be resolved through mediation.

What happens if dispute resolution is unsuccessful?

Where the mediation process is unsuccessful, the mediator can issue a ‘Section 60I’ certificate so that the parties can then apply to the Family Court for parenting orders.

The certificate is issued to cover a number of circumstances, including that both parties attended and made a genuine effort to resolve the dispute. It can also indicate that one party did not make a genuine effort, that one party did not attend, that the mediator decided mediation was not appropriate in the circumstances (such as where family violence is present) or that the process could not be completed.

Need some information that relates to your circumstance?

Why not book a free appointment now with a family law expert.

Exceptions to the dispute resolution

There are a few exemptions to the compulsory requirement for parties to mediation before applying to the court for parenting orders.

There are:

  • When the parties are formalising an agreement through ‘consent orders’;
  • where family violence or child abuse is a factor;
  • when one or both parties are responding to an application to the court;
  • where one party is unable to participate effectively (due to incapacity, geographical location or other factors);
  • where a person has contravened and shown a serious disregard for a court order made in the last 12 months.

The benefits of this form of dispute resolution

Applying to a court for orders in relation to parenting or other matters involved in a relationship separation is both expensive and time-consuming. Legal representation, court fees and delays in the matter coming to court are all issues to be considered.

By contrast, mediation is significantly cheaper, takes less time and empowers the ex-couple to come up with their own solutions to the difficult issues involved in parenting arrangements.

Provided each party approaches mediation with a civil, cooperative mindset and a genuine desire to create a workable parenting plan, family law mediation can avoid the need for the stress and time involved in going to court.

What Should You Do Now?

At Mediations Australia, we have a team of family lawyers and mediators who can assist you in Sydney, Perth, Adelaide, Melbourne, Brisbane, and all other locations in Australia. We also do international family law matters.

Getting legal advice early is the most important thing to do.

Sadly people often wait too long to get legal advice. Take advantage of our FREE consultation with a family law expert.
How Are Contributions Assessed in Family Law Matters?

How Are Contributions Assessed in Family Law Matters?

By Family Law

In the sad event that marriage or de facto relationship comes to an end, one of the most contentious areas when it comes to the disentangling of two lives is the property settlement.

In particular, the issue of contributions by each party to the relationship can become a common sticking point in any division of assets and liabilities. Contributions can consist of both financial and non-financial inputs into the former union.

There is no set formula for assessing these contributions – each case must be assessed on its unique circumstances to achieve a just and equitable division of property between the parties.

This article provides some more detail on how contributions in a relationship are assessed by a court but if you are at the stage where a property settlement is required to properly end a former relationship, contact Mediations Australia as soon as possible.

Considering a Property Settlement?

Find out where you stand. Book a free initial consultation with a family law expert.

More detail on contributions

As we’ve mentioned, contributions considered in an asset pool as part of a property settlement can be both financial and non-financial.

Financial contributions: In a relationship, these may be direct or indirect in the acquisition, conservation or improvement of any property of the parties. Financial contributions before, during and after the marriage or relationship may be considered.

One party may have property when they enter the relationship, for example. Whether this property becomes part of the asset pool to be divided in a property settlement will depend on how the property is used during the relationship and what contributions to the property the other party makes.

During the marriage, an inheritance received by one spouse, for example, will generally be considered part of the asset pool. As will career assets such as income, superannuation, long-service leave or a redundancy payment, as well as shareholdings.

In relation to property acquired after a separation, the interest of the ex-partner who owns the property is balanced against the other partner’s contribution to it before deciding whether it is added to the asset pool. Another method of assessment takes a broader approach and looks at all contributions made by the ex-partner (the one who doesn’t own the property) to common matters between the parties.

Under section 79(4)(a) of the Family Law Act 1975, the court must assess both direct and indirect financial contributions. An example of a direct contribution is a lump sum paid against a mortgage, while an example of an indirect contribution is the use of earnings to meet household expenses. The court often deals with the situation where one party to the relationship pays the mortgage and the other meets household expenses from their earnings, complicating the assessment of how much each party contributed to the acquisition, conservation or improvement of a property.

Non-financial contributions: Examples of these contributions include where one party to the relationship has improved the family home by using their own labour (renovating, painting, gardening, landscaping, e.g.), as well as their contributions as a parent and a homemaker.

These have come to be seen as no less important than financial contributions in family property settlements. Evidence of these contributions will be assessed by the court and given a percentage value, which is then added to the overall contribution that the court believes each party made to the relationship.

Book a Free Consultation with a Family Law Expert.

Considering a property settlement? Find out where you stand sooner rather than later.

How is this information used?

The assessment of contributions to the former relationship is one question in a number the court asks to determine a property settlement.

The court first determines the assets and liabilities of the parties to the relationship to form an asset pool for division; assesses the contributions of each party; assesses the ‘future needs’ of each party, and finally asks whether the proposed division of property and assets is ‘just and equitable’.

It’s important to note that when assessing contributions, the length of a relationship can be a significant factor. Where a couple were together for five years or more, the court will take a more holistic view of how assets from the relationship were acquired and maintained – more recent contributions may be allocated greater weight than older or initial contributions due to the passing of time ‘blending’ an ex-couple’s interests.

In relationships of shorter duration, they are more likely to be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Seeking expert advice

In Mediations Australia, family law is one of our specialties. Reaching a property settlement when a relationship ends is a stressful experience and understanding what you may be entitled to can be confusing.

We can help give you a better picture of what are entitled to ask for in a property settlement, in particular by assisting you to understand the value of your contributions to the relationship. Contact us for Mediation today.

What Should You Do Now?

At Mediations Australia, we have a team of family lawyers and mediators who can assist you in Sydney, Perth, Adelaide, Melbourne and all other locations in Australia. We also do international family law matters.

Getting legal advice early is the most important thing to do.

Sadly people often wait too long to get legal advice. Take advantage of our FREE consultation with a family law expert.
mediation

Family Law Mediation. What Happens If I Don’t Want to Do It?

By Family Law, Mediation

At the outset, there are circumstances in which mediation is not appropriate and we will detail them further in this article.

In Australia and throughout the World there is a growing acknowledgment that litigation does not work, but for the very few who have no other alternative. Litigation is often lengthy, costly, have little regard for the emotional impact of all involved and invariably hands down judgments that no one typically is happy with, but have no other choice but to live with. Conversely, collaborative law, mediation, and arbitration are all ways in which you and your ex-partner are able to play very active roles in how your family law dispute is negotiated and the middle ground that you both are willing to agree to. That said, there are no winners or losers in mediation either, but you will walk away when successful spending significantly less time and money than the alternative.

Is Mediation Compulsory?

Family Law Mediation which is also called Family Dispute Resolution (“FDR“) is the mandated preliminary step to initiating court proceedings in family law matters. Once mediation has been completed hopefully your matter has now been resolved, but if not, you will be issued a certificate from the mediator advising the court whether or not a genuine attempt was made by you and your ex-partner at the mediation.

More specifically, the Certificate will state one of the following:

  • the other party did not attend
  • you and the other party attended and made a genuine effort to resolve the dispute
  • you and the other party attended but one or both of you did not make a genuine effort to resolve the dispute
  • the FDR practitioner decided your case was not appropriate for FDR, or
  • the FDR practitioner decided it was not appropriate to continue partway through the FDR process.

Importantly, if you want to say “No” to mediation because you have fears of violence towards you or fears that your child or children have been abused, you need to raise this at the outset with the mediator. In these circumstances, there will be no requirement for you to attend the mediation.

But What If I Just Don’t Show Up?

There can be significant ramifications in simply not attending FDR, in particular, considerable delays in trying to get the dispute listed by the court and the potential risk that because of your no-attendance the court may order you to have to pay your ex-partners legal costs.

How Can Mediations Australia Help?

At Mediations Australia, we can answer your questions regarding FDR and other types of alternate dispute resolution. Call one of our Perth, Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane meditation teams today.

Getting legal advice early is the most important thing to do.

Sadly people often wait too long to get legal advice. Take advantage of our FREE consultation with a family law expert.