Skip to content

What is the Difference Between Mediation and Family Dispute Resolution?

What is the Difference Between Mediation and Family Dispute Resolution

One of the most commonly asked questions is “What is the Difference Between Mediation and Family Dispute Resolution?”

In Australia, the resolution of disputes outside of court has become increasingly important, especially for family law matters. Two prominent processes utilised for this purpose are mediation and Family Dispute Resolution (FDR). While both aim to facilitate communication and negotiation between parties to reach an agreement, there are significant differences in their application, particularly in how they are governed by law. This informational content aims to clarify these differences and their implications in the Australian legal context.

Understanding Mediation

Mediation is a widely recognised form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where an impartial third party—often called a mediator—facilitates a conversation between the disputing parties. The aim is for the parties to understand each other’s perspectives and work towards a mutually satisfactory resolution. The mediator plays a neutral role and does not impose decisions.

Process of Mediation

The typical mediation process includes the following steps:

  1. Preparation: Parties gather their relevant documents and formulate their objectives for the mediation.
  2. Opening Statements: Each party presents their views on the dispute.
  3. Discussion: The mediator fosters an open dialogue, helping clarify issues.
  4. Private Meetings: The mediator may conduct private sessions with each party to explore concerns.
  5. Negotiation: The parties, facilitated by the mediator, engage in discussions to negotiate potential solutions.
  6. Agreement: If a resolution is found, it is documented in a written form.

When is Mediation Used?

Mediation is applicable in various contexts including:

  • Commercial disputes: Such as contract disagreements between businesses.
  • Neighbourhood disputes: Issues like property boundaries or noise complaints.
  • Employment conflicts: Including allegations of discrimination or unfair dismissal.
  • Family law disputes: involving parenting, and property matters

Mediation can be initiated voluntarily by the parties themselves or ordered by the court as a part of litigation.

Family Dispute Resolution Under the Family Law Act

Family Dispute Resolution (FDR), specifically related to family law issues, is governed by the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). FDR seeks to help separating parents resolve matters like child custody arrangements or property disputes without immediately resorting to court intervention.

Compulsory FDR Before Applying for Parenting Orders

According to Section 60I of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), parties must attend FDR before they can file a parenting order request in court unless there are specific exceptions. This is designed to encourage parents to settle disputes amicably, benefiting the children involved.

Role of Accredited FDR Practitioners

FDR practitioners must be accredited and are responsible for facilitating the discussions in a neutral manner. They are trained to assess the suitability of cases for FDR, especially concerning issues of power imbalances or family violence. Practitioners will guide discussions, provide information, and, if required, prepare parenting plans to formalize any agreement reached.

Exceptions to Compulsory FDR (Section 60I(9))

There are circumstances where parties may bypass mandatory FDR prior to seeking a parenting order, including:

  1. Urgency: When immediate court intervention is necessary, such as in cases of child abduction.
  2. Family Violence: If there has been prior or ongoing violence which may affect the safety of either party or a child.
  3. Risk to a child: Concerns about potential abuse or neglect.
  4. Noncompliance with Orders: Prior violation of court orders may exempt a party from FDR.
  5. Practical Impossibility: Situations where a party cannot effectively participate in FDR.

For example, a parent with a history of family violence may be granted an exemption from the FDR requirement, permitting them to seek a court order directly.

FDR Certificates (Section 60I(8))

If FDR is attempted but a resolution is not reached, the accredited practitioner will issue a certificate to the court indicating the parties’ attendance and efforts. These certificates are critical as they demonstrate compliance with the FDR requirements and can influence subsequent legal proceedings. If a party does not make a genuine effort to participate in FDR, this can be detrimental to their position in court, as highlighted in the case of Wang & Dennison [2009] FamCAFC 171.

Court-Ordered FDR (Section 13C)

Under Section 13C of the Family Law Act, a court can mandate parties to attend FDR at any stage of the proceedings. Courts may order FDR if they believe it could help in narrowing down issues or facilitate resolution. Noncompliance with such an order can lead to penalties, including adverse inferences in future decisions or the imposition of costs.

Genuine Effort in FDR: Case Study

The significance of good faith participation in FDR is underscored by the case of Wang & Dennison [2009] FamCAFC 171. The Full Court of the Family Court highlighted that parties must approach FDR with a genuine willingness to resolve disputes; failing which could compromise their standing in subsequent litigation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Family Dispute Resolution (FDR) in the Australian legal context? Family Dispute Resolution is an alternative dispute resolution process specifically designed to help separated families resolve their disagreements outside of court. It involves working with qualified FDR practitioners who facilitate discussions aimed at finding mutually acceptable solutions to family law issues.

Who conducts Family Dispute Resolution sessions? Sessions are conducted by accredited Family Dispute Resolution practitioners who are trained in conflict management and negotiation techniques. These professionals are independent third parties who don’t take sides but help guide the conversation toward constructive outcomes.

Is participating in Family Dispute Resolution mandatory in Australia? Yes, in most cases involving parenting disputes, attempting Family Dispute Resolution is legally required before filing court proceedings under the Family Law Act. This requirement exists to reduce court caseloads and encourage families to find collaborative solutions. However, there are exceptions in certain circumstances.

Process and Procedure

How does the Family Dispute Resolution process typically unfold? The process typically begins with both parties attending sessions at a family relationship center or another designated service. The FDR practitioner facilitates discussions, helping participants identify issues, explore options, and work toward agreements. They don’t make decisions for you but guide the conversation while maintaining neutrality.

What communication methods are used during FDR sessions? Sessions usually involve joint discussions where both parties are present together. However, in some situations, practitioners may use what’s called “shuttle mediation,” where parties remain in separate rooms while the practitioner moves between them to facilitate communication.

If we reach an agreement during FDR, what happens next? If an agreement is reached, the FDR practitioner will help document the terms. These agreements can then be formalised into legally enforceable arrangements, such as consent orders or parenting plans, depending on what’s appropriate for your situation.

Scope and Applications

What types of family issues can be addressed through FDR? Family Dispute Resolution can help resolve several types of family law matters including:

  • Arrangements for children (parenting time, responsibilities, decision-making)
  • Division of property and assets following separation
  • Financial matters including child support
  • Other issues arising from family separation

Are there situations where FDR might not be appropriate? Yes, Family Dispute Resolution may not be suitable in cases involving family violence, child abuse, or where there are safety concerns for any participant. It’s also not appropriate for urgent matters that require immediate court intervention, such as preventing a child from being removed from Australia.

Practical Considerations

How long does the Family Dispute Resolution process typically take? The duration varies depending on your specific circumstances and the complexity of issues being discussed. Typically, a session lasts between 1-4 hours. Simple matters might be resolved in just one session, while more complex situations may require multiple meetings over a period of time.

What are the costs associated with Family Dispute Resolution? Costs vary depending on where you access the service. Many government-funded Family Relationship Centres offer FDR services at minimal or no cost. Private practitioners will charge professional fees that vary based on their experience and location. Some services also offer legally assisted FDR where lawyers support the process, which incurs additional costs.

How do I find a qualified Family Dispute Resolution practitioner? You can find accredited practitioners through several channels: your family law firm, the Attorney General’s Department FDR registry, or by contacting a Family Relationship Centre. When selecting a practitioner, look for someone who is not only accredited but also has experience in your specific type of dispute.

Benefits and Limitations

What advantages does FDR offer compared to going to court? Family Dispute Resolution offers several benefits including:

  • Cost effectiveness compared to litigation
  • A less stressful and more collaborative approach
  • Confidentiality protections
  • Typically faster resolution than court proceedings
  • Greater control over the outcome for all participants

What happens if we can’t reach an agreement through FDR? If you’re unable to resolve your issues through Family Dispute Resolution, the practitioner will issue what’s called a Section 60I certificate. This document confirms you’ve made a genuine attempt at FDR and allows you to proceed with court proceedings if necessary. Even without a final agreement, many people find the FDR process helpful in clarifying issues before going to court.

Legal Status

Are agreements reached during FDR legally binding? The agreements themselves aren’t automatically legally binding. However, they can be formalized into legally enforceable arrangements through:

  • Consent orders (approved by the court)
  • Binding financial agreements (with independent legal advice)
  • Parenting plans (which, while not strictly enforceable, courts take into serious consideration)

Do I need a lawyer to participate in Family Dispute Resolution? Legal representation isn’t required for FDR sessions. However, it’s often beneficial to get legal advice before, during, or after the process to understand your rights and options. Some FDR services offer legally assisted mediation where lawyers are present during sessions.

Can discussions from FDR be used in court later? No, the FDR process is confidential. Statements made during sessions generally cannot be used as evidence if the matter proceeds to court. This confidentiality protection encourages open and honest communication during the process.

Next Steps: Engaging in Mediation or FDR

If mediation or FDR seems appropriate for your situation, consider the following steps:

  1. Legal Advice: Consult a lawyer to understand your legal rights and potential implications.
  2. Finding Practitioners: Engage with accredited practitioners for FDR, ensuring they have the necessary qualifications. You can find Accredited FDR practitioners through relevant professional bodies.
  3. Prepare: Gather documentation relevant to your dispute and outline your objectives for the session.
  4. Participate: Attend the mediation or FDR sessions in good faith, being open to all points of view.
  5. Review: If an agreement is reached, make sure to have it duly documented and reviewed legally.

In conclusion, while mediation and FDR share similar objectives in resolving disputes outside of court, they operate within different frameworks, particularly in the family law domain. Understanding these distinctions is vital for legal professionals and their clients alike as they navigate the complexities of family law in Australia. Always seek appropriate legal counsel to enhance understanding and ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.


Legal Disclaimer

The information in this article is provided for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. For specific legal advice regarding your situation, please consult a qualified legal professional.

Get Help from Mediations Australia